On Fri, 24 May 2013 09:26:34 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of us are employees of or otherwise manage to siphon money
from these companies. Make a pitch... (And some of us are happy
to freelance ;)
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
That fortunately is documented, with some pretty good notes in
the wiki as well that aught to percolate into the docs. That
said, documenting every Microsoft-version-quirk seems out of
scope for a general purpose
On 24.05.2013 21:37, Ben Reser wrote:
The build system should be able to compile with the major tool chains,
nobody expects to know how to work around weird autoconf, make, gcc,
etc quirks on Linux. I don't say this to be dismissive of anyones
contributions but just to point out that producing
On Fri, 24 May 2013 21:53:50 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 24.05.2013 21:37, Ben Reser wrote:
The build system should be able to compile with the major tool
chains, nobody expects to know how to work around weird autoconf,
make, gcc, etc quirks on Linux. I don't say this
On 5/24/2013 12:53 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
yeah ...; and from what I see our project files are already broken
even when not converted and used directly with MSVC6, f.e. when doing
a release build a bunch of files land in the debug folder, and finally
at linking stage it breaks ...
