William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Feedback from Ben via legal-discuss, since his httpd-dev list seems
to have fallen over and can't get up.
Bill
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?]
From:
Ben Laurie
On 9/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic,
they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other
adverse effects.
Yes, exactly.
Schrauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 September 2007 09:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?
I found ActivePerl to not work to well on x64... I compiled the original
perl source with MSVC70 and it works ok with extensions compiled with
MSVC80... I
to OpenSSL doesn't mean you need to implement it.
If there's any encumbrance, then I see even less reason to implement
(less than none, that is).
Bill
Subject:
Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?
From
to be released before it (and, of course, will
also contain the changes).
Steve
--
*From:* Jorge Schrauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 20 September 2007 09:37
*To:* dev@httpd.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?
I found ActivePerl
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic,
they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other
adverse effects.
Yes, exactly. openssl doesn't select gzip compression if zlib-dynamic
and zlib1.dll
Two questions, one technical one legal.
Technically, do we want to enable the Camillia algorithms in our
binary builds of openssl 0.9.8 for win32 and other platforms where
we might build it?
Legally are we satisfied by
http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/crypt/eng/info/chiteki.html
? There is a small
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Two questions, one technical one legal.
Technically, do we want to enable the Camillia algorithms in our
binary builds of openssl 0.9.8 for win32 and other platforms where
we might build it?
Legally are we satisfied by
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Two questions, one technical one legal.
Technically, do we want to enable the Camillia algorithms in our
binary builds of openssl 0.9.8 for win32 and other platforms where
we might build it?
Legally are we satisfied by
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic,
they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other
adverse effects.
Yes, exactly. openssl doesn't select gzip compression if zlib-dynamic
and zlib1.dll is missing.
The other
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The other aspect, if a zlib1.dll replacement is needed for some critical
decryption flaw in zlib again, it will be nice not to force users to
entirely replace openssl or mod_deflate. So I expect we'll leave it
as-is.
I think mod_deflate on
11 matches
Mail list logo
