On 7/23/2013 11:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > druggeri notes that the uds support in trunk fails if used for > a balancemember... Are there any reports/backtraces/etc > re: this? It would be a nice thing for me to play around w/ > while on vaca
Jim; No, while I was testing UDS against the patches provided I came across it myself. I don't have a server running on a UDS on my test machine but my normal proxy tests always involve a balancer. It seems to only be a matter of parsing. Error message is "BalancerMember must define remote proxy server" when BalancerMember is set to something like http://socket=%2Fhome%2Fwww%2Fsocket I didn't pursue further than that since it doesn't seem like the functionality would be used a lot in balancers and can be ironed out in future patches if that is desired. -- Daniel Ruggeri
