Peter, what version of Apache are you testing this with?
apache 2.2.16
From: Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 4:03:40 PM
Subject: Re: ap_sub_req_lookup_file vs ap_sub_req_lookup_uri
Peter, what version of Apache are you testing this with?
ap_sub_req_lookup_file() should work, it's what mod_include uses when
you have !--#include file=/foo/bar-- on your page. You might want
to take a look at its source.
response content or are filters
required to concatenate subrequest content for the response?
peter
From: Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 9:39:39 AM
Subject: Re: ap_sub_req_lookup_file vs
the
filter
chain?
From: Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 1:17:43 PM
Subject: Re: ap_sub_req_lookup_file vs ap_sub_req_lookup_uri
You call it with next_filter=NULL instead of f-next? That'll skip
You call it with next_filter=NULL instead of f-next? That'll skip the
regular filter chain, probably not what you want.
