On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi (Bill?),
another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32
does this meanwhile work on Win32?
And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros?
I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi (Bill?),
another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32
does this meanwhile work on Win32?
And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros?
I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir is already
Hi Randy,
There's a perl script that emulates apxs on Win32 available
in apxs_win32.tar.gz at
http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/
perfect answer since the one who asked me did that for mod_perl!
Right now this is installed assuming an already-installed
Apache; if there's interest, I
Guenter Knauf wrote:
if the one we have in ./support works already with 3rd-party modules (other
than mod_perl) on Win32 then we can just use that; otherwise I'm +1 to add
yours.
It does not, its crafted from libtool-junk last time I looked, and
requires apr similarly provisioned (apr-config
Hi (Bill?),
another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32
does this meanwhile work on Win32?
And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros?
I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir is already
included
Guenter.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi (Bill?),
another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32
does this meanwhile work on Win32?
And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros?
I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir is already
included
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi (Bill?),
another dev just asked me privately about apxs for Win32
does this meanwhile work on Win32?
And if so can we perhaps ship it with future distros?
I think that would make sense since the include and lib dir is already
included
Dunno if Randy's package
Something test-dev has kicked around that we should pick back up...
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:44:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Randy Kobes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
As Bill mentioned in another message, it looks like it would be
possible to integrate it within httpd-2.0. So rather than
including it within the Apache-Test sources, what I could do is
add a post-install script
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
That's what I was thinking - sorry, I should have been clearer.
ppm has a feature that, when one installs a ppm package, a script
from some server can optionally be fetched and run (by Perl, or
anything,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I know
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place would
At 10:09 PM 7/29/2003, Randy Kobes wrote:
As far getting the right name for the Win32 binary goes with apxs
present, I don't think there's an ideal solution ... To
summarize, the problem is that apxs -q TARGET ( = httpd) is used
in Apache-Test for the name of the apache binary, whereas in
other
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
+1 on the patch
Randy, whatever you think is the best for win32, please go
ahead with it. Untill we get someone else on win32 involved,
you are pretty much free to decide how to handle things and
what's the best for the user, as long as the changes
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
As Bill mentioned in another message, it looks like it would be
possible to integrate it within httpd-2.0. So rather than
including it within the Apache-Test sources, what I could do is
add a post-install script to the
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it, I've put up two files - Configure.apxs
and apxs.in - at http://theoryx5
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it, I've put up two files - Configure.apxs
and apxs.in - at http
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it, I've put
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try
21 matches
Mail list logo
