Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:28 PM 9/18/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: rfc1413.c === +/* Win32 timeouts are in msec, represented as int */ +msec = timeout * 1000; +setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO,

RE: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread Wilt, Paul
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES At 02:28 PM 9/18/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: rfc1413.c === +/* Win32 timeouts are in msec, represented as int */ +msec

RE: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread Resume
please remove my address from this mailing list as I was never asked to be put on. Thank you -Original Message- From: Wilt, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:50 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES Bill: Wasn't

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
Wilt, Paul wrote: Bill: Wasn't Jeff referring to the // single line comment in his message about watching for language? yep I'm expecting it to not fail on a real C (99) compiler.

RE: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES At 02:28 PM 9/18/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: rfc1413.c === +/* Win32 timeouts are in msec, represented as int */ +msec = timeout * 1000; +setsockopt

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2003-09-18 Thread Brian Havard
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:49:33 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 02:28 PM 9/18/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: rfc1413.c === +/* Win32 timeouts are in msec, represented as int */ +msec =

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2001-12-20 Thread Bill Stoddard
With this, I'm thinking it's time for 1.3.23, which should hold us for 1.3 releases for the better part of 2002. Yeas or Neas? Bill - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:34 AM Subject: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2001-12-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:24 AM With this, I'm thinking it's time for 1.3.23, which should hold us for 1.3 releases for the better part of 2002. Yeas or Neas? Yea [but] but we are seeing a lot of problems with parsed (SHTML, PHP etc)

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2001-12-20 Thread Thomas Eibner
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 11:28:22AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:24 AM With this, I'm thinking it's time for 1.3.23, which should hold us for 1.3 releases for the better part of 2002. Yeas or Neas?

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src CHANGES

2001-12-20 Thread Bill Stoddard
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:24 AM With this, I'm thinking it's time for 1.3.23, which should hold us for 1.3 releases for the better part of 2002. Yeas or Neas? Yea [but] but we are seeing a lot of problems with parsed (SHTML, PHP