William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
But studio (or eclipse or codewarrior or [name your IDE]) users would
appreciate a perspective into the sources. The IDE-accessible nature
of the original Win32 port is what made it so easy for me to jump in,
understand and
William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
Lets look to supporting [name your favorite IDE] as a bigger picture
item not specific to windows, and to transition away from .dsp for
the build/ide view support.
What about going one step further and using a tool
able to
Dan Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED]　wrote on 2008-11-3 21:13
William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
Lets look to supporting [name your favorite IDE] as a bigger picture
item not specific to windows, and to transition away from .dsp for
the build/ide view support.
Re:
Marc Noirot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 22:06
William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
Lets look to supporting [name your favorite IDE] as a bigger picture
item not specific to windows, and to transition away from .dsp for
the build/ide view support.
What
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I compiled them on vs2008 IIRC (not sure only boot into the vm when
need to compile)
Sadly the exact same version is needed or else it refuses to load.
That is what wrowe mentioned above with all the minor version bumps
here and there.
Precisely. Also note; VC2008
Marc Noirot wrote:
What about going one step further and using a tool
able to generate Makefiles and IDE files for [name some of your favorite IDEs] ?
+1.
Binding httpd to one IDE significantly reduces the developer audience,
it would help a lot if Windows could have the same autoconf
On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Marc Noirot wrote:
What about going one step further and using a tool
able to generate Makefiles and IDE files for [name some of your
favorite IDEs] ?
I'm thinking about something like CMake ...
http://lwn.net/Articles/188693/
http://www.cmake.org/
+1
But it
cmake seems very interesting.
I'd like to help if you go that path, not sure I'll be of much use though.
~Jorge
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Marc Noirot wrote:
What about going one step further and using a tool
able to
