On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:12:21PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:02:21AM -0400, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:46:58PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > yes I believe that is what it does. It basically hammers the httpd
> > with dozens of simultaneous requests
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:02:21AM -0400, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:46:58PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for testing this out Marc: unfortunately these patches break
> > assumptions that various filters are making; applying them alone is
> > likely to cause lots o
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:46:58PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing this out Marc: unfortunately these patches break
> assumptions that various filters are making; applying them alone is
> likely to cause lots of random module segfaults. It's yet to be decided
> whether the patch is
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 09:33:52AM -0400, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> So patched my httpd with Joe's patches and let it run overnight.
>
> So good news is that these patches seem to solve the problem for the
> test cgi mentioned in the original PR (#23567).
>
> However, as soon as someone uses the "Wi
Hi,
So patched my httpd with Joe's patches and let it run overnight.
So good news is that these patches seem to solve the problem for the
test cgi mentioned in the original PR (#23567).
However, as soon as someone uses the "WinGet" download accelerator to
download Mp3 files from my CGI prog (see
Bill Stoddard wrote:
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(&pool->cleanups);
-pool->cleanups = NULL;
+pool->free_cleanups = pool->cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool->child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(&pool->cleanups);
-pool->cleanups = NULL;
+pool->free_cleanups = pool->cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool->child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,13 @@
#endif /* APR_
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> apr_brigade_create() does that already.
Oh, duh, of course it does. As many times as I've looked at that line,
you'd think I'd have it memorized by now. :)
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:14:53PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > 2) allocate brigade structures using the bucket allocator
>
> If you're going to do this, then surely you need to call
> apr_pool_cleanup_register() somewhere?
apr_brigade_create() does t
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Joe Orton wrote:
> 2) allocate brigade structures using the bucket allocator
If you're going to do this, then surely you need to call
apr_pool_cleanup_register() somewhere?
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/buck
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:23:42PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
OK, the issues I was having with using the bucket allocator to allocate
the brigade were just my own screwups. So, the patches needed to fix
this issue are attached:
1) re-use pool
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:45:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>Actually I think this was addressed quite a while ago with the
> introduction of the MaxMemFree directive. This problem sounds a lot
> like the bucket issue where memory all
So I tried setting "MaxMemFree 5000", but it hasn't changed anything,
I was quickly able to bloat the child httpd by an extra 17+ Mb. and it hasn't
gone down since (I'm using the prefork MPM on Linux).
-m
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 01:45:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>Actually I think this wa
Actually I think this was addressed quite a while ago with the
introduction of the MaxMemFree directive. This problem sounds a lot
like the bucket issue where memory allocated for the bucket brigade that
pushes the data through from the CGI app to the wire, simply held on to
the memory assuming
Hi,
[I'm writing to the dev list because it seems that not enough apache
developers have noticed or taken interest into the original PR's
on this bug]
This is a real and easy to reproduce bug that has been agonizing me
for a quite a while. It's been reported since at least October '03.
1.3.x does
15 matches
Mail list logo
