On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 22:31, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the
case
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Yes, I am supporting Rüdiger's proposition. Don't make up some HTTP
status code for the aborted-connection condition. We already have a
way to record this issue (%c).
I guess by %c you mean what is now %X in, mod_log_config, right?
On 9/14/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Yes, I am supporting Rüdiger's proposition. Don't make up some HTTP
status code for the aborted-connection condition. We already have a
way to record this issue (%c).
I
On 09/13/2006 01:44 AM, wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Tue Sep 12 16:44:12 2006
New Revision: 442758
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=442758
Log:
PR 31759 (mutated) - reported by Jo Rhett
Don't return apr_status_t error value from input filter chain.
Modified:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case
that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler?
I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we have no client
to respond to, so this is just
On 09/13/2006 10:17 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case
that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler?
I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we
On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the case
that c-aborted is set, just like in the default handler?
I'm not sure. Presumably if c-aborted is set, then we
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 22:31, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to return OK even if rv != APR_SUCCESS in the
case that c-aborted is set, just like in the default
