Re: [VOTE] Release 0.9.0, release candidate #2

2021-08-23 Thread Balaji Varadarajan
+1 (binding)  $ ./release/validate_staged_release.sh --release=${RC_VERSION} --rc_num=2 ...Downloading from svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist//dev/hudiValidating hudi-0.9.0-rc2 with release type "dev"Checking Checksum of Source Release Checksum Check of Source Release - [OK]   % Total 

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.9.0, release candidate #2

2021-08-23 Thread Bhavani Sudha
+1 (binding) On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:23 PM Sivabalan wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 1. Release validation succeeded > 2. Ran quick start for two variants (spark2, scala11 and spark3, scala12) > for all operations. > 3. Ran docker demo and verified all 3 query engines (spark sql, hive, > presto)

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.9.0, release candidate #2

2021-08-23 Thread Sivabalan
+1 (binding) 1. Release validation succeeded 2. Ran quick start for two variants (spark2, scala11 and spark3, scala12) for all operations. 3. Ran docker demo and verified all 3 query engines (spark sql, hive, presto) and 3 query types(snapshot, read optimized, incremental) across two tables.

Re: Apache Hudi release voting process

2021-08-23 Thread Udit Mehrotra
Thanks Sivabalan, for starting this thread and laying out the timelines we followed in detail. And appreciate all the community members, who are so passionately debating to ensure a quality release. As all of you mentioned, "-1" is an important right maintained by the community members, but we

Re: Apache Hudi release voting process

2021-08-23 Thread vino yang
Hi, +1 for: >> We have never encountered an issue like this before. So it's an opportunity to draft an agreed upon set of criteria for what qualifies for a valid -1, this also needs us as a community in investing in nightly integration tests, and more volunteers to ensure our tests are not flaky