Great Summary Brandon.
Given that Maven allows one to specify the resources folder (and even filter
out certain files, like we will for .java files eventually), and considering
that it does not cast a warning or error upon setting the resource directory
to the source directory, I would consider
I made the following changes to the pom.xml. I had to use 1.0.1B of
JTA because it was available on the Sun repo. Hopefully that won't
cause an issue.
- set exclude on *.java in resource definitions for core and compat
- added java.net repository definition and set jta to 1.0.1B. Not the
latest
That's good to hear. I'm too lazy to go confirm much of this :). So,
thanks for doing some foot work to find examples where this is being
used without problem. I know Maven provides for this feature. But, I
have run across other features that were provided for and wound up
causing headaches.
Yeah the nice thing about it now is that nobody has to manually
download a sun jar. I'm glad this will work.
B
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder what is up with JTA? The pom in the maven.org repo also only
references 1.01b and the Sun distro of
Hi,
although it is possible to do this with maven I would rather like to see that the maven defaults are used -
just because they are some kind of convention - and convention over configuration is one of the key features
of maven. Anyway - I guess it is not a big deal to reuse the source
Everybody would always prefer to use the defaults. But it's important
to know when not to.
To clarify, for the purposes of the ibatis 3 source code, this only
impacts the unit tests. When it comes time to include XML schemas (or
DTDs), we'll likley put them in a separate resources folder.
What
And by abator, I mean ibator :-)
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all,
I've moved the iBATIS SVN directory structure around. The structure is
now:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ibatis/trunk/java/
ibatis-2
ibatis-2-core
Cool. That makes sense.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer to leave ibator where it is. As far as I can tell at this
point, ibator support for ibatis3 will simply be a different plugin to the
base code. So there won't be an ibator2 and an
