In my own little perfect world, I'm -1. The iBATIS ant build is so
simple now - I hate to see it mucked up just to supply the Maven meta-bs as
Clinton so eloquently put it.
However, I would like to see the iBATIS jars in the Maven repository - if
for no other reason than to help those who can't
Can we get the iBATIS jars to the maven repository without doing a maven
build?
Yes
On 2/14/07, Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my own little perfect world, I'm -1. The iBATIS ant build is so
simple now - I hate to see it mucked up just to supply the Maven meta-bs as
Clinton so
Hi all,
It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build
to warrant an official vote for Maven support.
+2 = Replace our Ant build entirely with a Maven build.
+1 = Support Maven by including a Maven build alongside our Ant build.
0 = Don't care or I don't know enough
I think this is a bit premature. My intention was to show a working
comparison so that this decision could be made in an informed manner.
Brandon
On 2/14/07, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build
to warrant an
If you want to know my opinion, +1. I guess Ant is everywhere in the
Java world while Maven is not (I personally prefer Ivy for dependency
management).
Regards,
Bruno Silva
Clinton Begin wrote:
Hi all,
It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build
to warrant an
Votes never close and can be changed, so don't worry about the timing.
Clinton
On 2/14/07, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a bit premature. My intention was to show a working
comparison so that this decision could be made in an informed manner.
Brandon
On 2/14/07,
Yes - I should have asked that question with more subtlety. I guess the
bottom line is that it is *possible* to get the jars to the repository
without doing a maven build, but doing a maven build makes it much easier to
publish to the repository. And our history shows that we are unlikely to
@ibatis.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Support for Maven (impacts Java version only)
Yes - I should have asked that question with more subtlety. I guess the
bottom line is that it is *possible* to get the jars to the repository
without doing
: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Support for Maven (impacts Java version only)
Yes - I should have asked that question with more subtlety. I guess the
bottom line is that it is *possible* to get the jars to the repository
without doing a maven build, but doing a maven
If that's the case, would it make sense to use Ant for build and Maven
for deploy?
One thing I'll miss with Maven is the tool integration. I imagine I
could get a Maven plugin for IDEA and Eclipse, but Ant is ubiquitous
and works with a lot of other tools.
At least I know Continuum works with
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Support for Maven (impacts Java version only)
Yes - I should have asked that question with more subtlety. I
guess
the
bottom line is that it is *possible* to get the jars to the
repository
without doing a maven build, but doing a maven build makes it much
easier
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ibatis.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Support for Maven (impacts Java version only)
Yes - I should have asked that question with more subtlety
12 matches
Mail list logo
