I currently hate Maven with a grand passion. But, I'm open minded and am
willing to be educated as to why people like it. I will make the same offer
I made before:
Three requirements:
#1 Create a maven build system for iBATIS that achieves the exact same
output, which includes:
- one click
Thanks for sharing your passions. My thoughts are below...
#1...
A. one click has never been a problem for maven. There seems to be a lot
of insinuation that maven requires a lot of config files. I'm not sure where
you are getting this. The only thing that we might need to do is break out
the
I wasn't implying that Maven COULDN'T do anything I was just laying out
what I would want to see from a maven build.
So, if you are saying we can't have an assembly config then gimme a
break.
What I mean is that if I can't check it out and build without having to
perform some developer
A serial number generator for builds does not easily exist for maven. We
had talked about using the svn repo revision number.
SVN repo number would be great. It's a little long because it's Apache's
global repos, but it would be more useful than the somewhat meaningless
build number we have
Comments are mixed in:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wasn't implying that Maven COULDN'T do anything I was just laying
out what I would want to see from a maven build.
So, if you are saying we can't have an assembly config then gimme a
As a follow up to all who are reading this thread. Let me be very clear. Any
aggressive comments are made in jest and fun. We are all good friends here
and enjoy the big brother banter. Please don't take this as an opportunity
to truly dig on any one of us.
Muchos Gracias,
Brandon
On Wed, May 7,
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Brandon Goodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a follow up to all who are reading this thread. Let me be very clear. Any
aggressive comments are made in jest and fun. We are all good friends here
and enjoy the big brother banter. Please don't take this as an
Reality check: Signs, MD5, and Uploads to Apache dist (with no
additional dependencies or configuration) - how's this going to work,
via telepathy? :-D
Trusted hosts (or same host) and a continuous integration server with a
manually invoked distribution target. CI server runs as the deploy
The other thing that can be nice about maven is for ibatis extension
development. We are making iB3 more accessible. This means that we are
likely to have more people wanting to write against ibatis. Maven makes it
nicer to create dependencies on nightly builds/snapshots.
Brandon
On Wed, May 7,
Sorry for the spotty emails. just stuff coming to my mind. Another point
would be the whole deploying to the maven repository can be made easier. We
want to be able to provide users with source artifacts and jar artifacts all
properly packaged with maven. I can do this manually. But, i'd rather
Geez I'm really sorry to fire off yet another...
Yet another point. Ant integration has become quite nice with maven. So, it
is possible we can augment maven insufficiencies with Ant.
Shutting up,
Brandon
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry for the
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Brandon Goodin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shutting up,
Yeah, we'll keep dreaming. ;-)
Larry
This is a vote to switch our build system from Ant to Maven 2.
Binding votes will be accepted from committers of the iBATIS for Java
project. All other votes will be taken as opinion, but non-binding.
This does not imply that we will use Maven for our website, but we could
indeed consider that
My Vote:
[0] Doesn't matter. As long as it builds as well as it currently does.
Clinton
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a vote to switch our build system from Ant to Maven 2.
Binding votes will be accepted from committers of the iBATIS for
If those are the only options, I'll vote +1.
If it were free form, I'd vote +0.5 I think they both suck, but maven
*might* suck less.?
;-)
Larry
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Vote:
[0] Doesn't matter. As long as it builds as well as it
Brandon Goodin's vote:
+1
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My Vote:
[0] Doesn't matter. As long as it builds as well as it currently does.
Clinton
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a vote to
NM, found it! Yes, to all 3.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone know off hand if Maven can easily support FindBugs, Checkstyle
and/or Jalopy?
Cheers,
Clinton
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Larry Meadors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hahah,
+1 from me
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
NM, found it! Yes, to all 3.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone know off hand if Maven can easily support FindBugs, Checkstyle
and/or Jalopy?
Cheers,
+0 - doesn't really matter to me. I don't know Maven yet - maybe this will
be a good opportunity for me to learn it.
Jeff Butler
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Clinton Begin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a vote to switch our build system from Ant to Maven 2.
Binding votes will be
19 matches
Mail list logo
