Avihai Berkovitz created IGNITE-2088:
Summary: EntryProcessor invoke might not run in CLOCK write order
Key: IGNITE-2088
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2088
Project: Ignite
Igniters,
Presently every node that is a part of a cluster listens for Service
Grid assignment changes in order to find out whether a service has to be
deployed on it or not.
However, there is a possible case when a node is not considered to be a
target for service A at all during its
Cos and Brane,
This issue arised not from our feeling of beautiful, but from practical
reasons,
namely we need to conform existing Maven and OSGi version models at the
same time.
We did not invent Maven or OSGi, but if we want to play with them well,
we have to keep in mind their own quirks and
Guys,
Community agreed to release Apache Ignite 1.5.0-b1.
Results: 9 "+1" votes (7 binding) out of 9 votes
The following votes were received:
1. Yakov Zhdanov +1 (binding)
2. Anton Vinogradov +1 (binding)
3. Nick Tikhonov +1 (binding)
4. Raul Kripalani +1 (binding)
5. Vladislav Jelisavcic +1
Denis,
What will happen if node B becomes a deployment target due to topology changes?
Thanks,
Roman
On Sunday, December 6, 2015 5:17 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
Igniters,
Presently every node that is a part of a cluster listens for Service
Grid assignment changes in order
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:30AM, Sergi Vladykin wrote:
> Cos and Brane,
>
> This issue arised not from our feeling of beautiful, but from practical
> reasons,
> namely we need to conform existing Maven and OSGi version models at the
> same time.
>
> We did not invent Maven or OSGi, but if we
Guys, I am looking into [1] and see a reference to
ignite.jdbc.url = "jdbc:ignite:cfg://"
So, I am curious if there's a way to fetch node's config via JDBC somehow? Or
this is just a simple error in the doc, which needs to be fixed?
Would appreciate the insight from the team. Thanks!
Cos
Dmitriyff created IGNITE-2089:
-
Summary: Implement static block callout
Key: IGNITE-2089
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2089
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Affects
Forking of the release schema conversation. I have noticed that official dist
http://archive.apache.org/dist//ignite/
has 2.2.2-test version. Anyone knows why it is there?
Cos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Oh, and not to say - JIRA would have to have a corresponding versions. Say
right now I see only 1.5 in JIRA and it has 161 unresolved bugs. However, the
-b1 release is already voted for and is almost official.
Cos
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 03:11PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015
10 matches
Mail list logo