Andrey,
Can you tell me what transaction is being blocked? If it is the transaction
in deadlock, then I think it should not matter, as it is blocked anyway.
D.
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Andrey Gura wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> Do you think that we should configure deadlock
I don't think that evicition from offheap to swap should fire
EVT_CACHE_OBJECT_EXPIRED event because it will indistinguishable from
normal eviction event.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Andrey, I think there should be an eviction event fired,
Dmitry,
Do you think that we should configure deadlock detection using cache
configuration?
User should have possibility to have control over this process because it
blocks transaction until detection completion.
You are right. Deadlock detection starts after transaction timeout and
lists
I just want to give some explanation about the two “-1” non-binding votes
we have received form the community.
The Apache voting process does not imply bug-free releases. Apache release
needs to be clean from licensing standpoint and needs to be easily
buildable. Of course, if there are critical
GitHub user f7753 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/741
IGNITE-2538 RDD.isEmpty method should be overriden in IgniteRDD to use
IgniteCache API
Currently calling `IgniteRDD.isEmpty` ends up in execution of 1024 Spark
jobs, which is not fast. We should