anism is already in Ignite.
>
> Native SQL APIs will automatically support the futures after implementing
> for thin clients. So we are good here.
>
>
>
> вт, 13 нояб. 2018 г. в 18:52, Denis Magda :
>
> > Yury,
> >
> > Please consider the following:
> >
> &g
Yury,
Please consider the following:
- If we record the duration instead of startTime, then the former has to
be updated frequently - sounds like a performance red flag. Should we store
startTime and endTime instead? This way a query record will be updated
twice - when the query is
Welcome, Albert! You are in, look forward to your contribution!
--
Denis
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:39 PM Альберт Исхаков
wrote:
> Hello, Ignite Community!
>
> My name is Albert Iskhakov. I want to contribute to Apache Ignite and want
> to start with this issue [1].
>
> JIRA username is
nis,
>
> Services reassignment process takes into account previous assignments
> to avoid redundant redeployments.
> So, in the described case, ServiceA won't be moved from node1 to node2.
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:41 AM Denis Magda wrote:
> >
> > Vyacheslav,
> >
&g
Vyacheslav,
First of all, thanks for archiving this milestone and rolling out these new
capabilities.
Speaking of the topology change events [1], does the new architecture avoid
a running service redeployment when a new node joins? For instance, let's
say I have ServiceA running node1, then
Yuri,
That's an excellent idea, thank you for driving it.
What is not explained is how to leverage from all that stat. For instance,
how can I know a total number of SELECTs, or a total number of SELECTs
happened yesterday for specific data sets. Do believe that it's feasible
and just not
Hi Stephen,
This is good news! Added you to the list, please move on ;)
--
Denis
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:31 AM Stephen Darlington <
stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve started to work on a couple of tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10155
>
+ dev list
Vladimir, Igniters,
Don't we wipe out the metadata on a cache destroy? Is it an issue or done
on purpose?
--
Denis
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:28 AM wt wrote:
> i am testing code and part of my tests is adding\removing tables. In one of
> the tests i add a table then destroy it
Hi Stan,
Thanks for the extensive analysis. Alex G. could you please step in and
share your thoughts. Seems it's time to revisit IEP-4 and prioritize the
gaps.
--
Denis
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:56 AM Stanislav Lukyanov
wrote:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> I've been looking into various scenarios of
Artem,
Thanks for the update. Basically, it would be much better if you list the
proposed changes here, so that everyone can share feedback without clicking
the links )
--
Denis
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:36 AM Artem Budnikov
wrote:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> Please take a look at the changes in the
Dmitry,
Thanks for the pointers!
Would you be interested in sorting this out for the community by talking to
our ASF-mates who should know?
--
Denis
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:21 AM Dmitriy Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> I'm not sure if someone in the community can know an answer to this
>
In my understanding, that's an easy operation to support - we just need to
allocate requested space and pre-touch it (iterate and fill out with 0).
Yes, it will increase the launch time but it's a valid use case. Some
companies do memory pre-touching on purpose.
--
Denis
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018
nd externally if all goes well :)
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:44 PM Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > Hey Scott,
> >
> > Great to know, welcome to the community!
> >
> > What exactly do you like to contribute back? Please start a separate
> > dis
Hey Scott,
Great to know, welcome to the community!
What exactly do you like to contribute back? Please start a separate
discussion with the most meaningful topic.
Also, if you can post a blog post about your architecture at VMWare will be
glad to mention it on the "Ignite in Production" page:
Alex,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but even if an OS runs out of physical memory (X
GB in total) an Ignite node process still can request the X GB from virtual
memory. Yes, virtual memory can involve swapping and disk to satisfy your
request but this shouldn't be a reason of the OOM. Shouldn't OOM
ently, we have *8*.
>
> В Пт, 19/10/2018 в 13:50 -0700, Denis Magda пишет:
> > Guys, as a side observer of the current release, this all looks like a
> > never ending story :)
> >
> > When are we sending a release candidate for vote?
> >
> > --
> > Deni
Hello Nikolay,
Your proposal sounds reasonable. However, I would suggest us to wait while
partition-awareness is supported for Java thin client first. With that
feature, the client can connect to any node directly while presently all
the communication goes through a proxy (a node the client is
Guys, as a side observer of the current release, this all looks like a
never ending story :)
When are we sending a release candidate for vote?
--
Denis
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:39 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> We have 6 tickets for 2.7
>
> Roman Kondakov - IGNITE-9892,
Here it is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9953
--
Denis
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 2:34 AM Petr Ivanov wrote:
> Can you file an issue then, please?
>
>
> > On 19 Oct 2018, at 04:04, Denis Magda wrote:
> >
> > I would do this if it does
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9953:
---
Summary: Dropping hadoop accelerator downloads
Key: IGNITE-9953
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9953
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
No objections from my side.
--
Denis
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> I would like to suggest dropping the hadoop accelerator distribution of
> Apache Ignite. Note, that it does not mean dropping any features. We are
> still going to support IGFS,
Key-value calls are just primary key based calls. From a user perspective,
it's the same as "SELECT * FROM table WHERE primary_idx = X", just
different API.
--
Denis
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:04 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:58 PM Denis Magda wrote:
&g
I've been calling everything "tables" instead of "caches" for a while. The
main reason is the maturity of our SQL engine - seeing more SQL users and
deployments which talk "tables" language.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:55 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> If dataset cannot be used, can we still
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9798:
---
Summary: Add TensorFlow Integration Page to Ignite website
Key: IGNITE-9798
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9798
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9797:
---
Summary: Refer to PHP, Python and Node.JS getting started guides
from the website
Key: IGNITE-9797
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9797
Project
t;
> ср, 3 окт. 2018 г. в 6:29, Denis Magda :
>
> > Alexey,
> >
> > Thanks for spreading the word about the ML capabilities! *Prachi*, please
> > help us to add the talks Alexey is going to give to Ignite events page:
> > https://ignite.apache.org/events.ht
Alexey,
Thanks for spreading the word about the ML capabilities! *Prachi*, please
help us to add the talks Alexey is going to give to Ignite events page:
https://ignite.apache.org/events.html
Btw, I gave a presentation about Ignite ML + TensorFlow integration today
at IMC Summit in the US. It
gt; > > > > > making
> > > > > > > > > > decision
> > > > > > > > > > > > to them, but not to some closed club of people who
> > > >
> > > > privately
> > > > > > > >
; > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > About including it in 2.7, if we talk that code freeze
> > > > tomorrow
> > > > > > > then
> > > > > > > > > > > the solution is not ready to merge yet.
> > > &
our algorithms builds over distributed datasets and
> we don't need it anymore.
>
> I created JIRA ticket <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9711>
> for this.
>
> Thanks,
> Yuriy
>
> чт, 27 сент. 2018 г. в 0:20, Denis Magda :
>
> > Yury, ML folks,
>
> Denis, as PMC Chair, could you please control, that Service Grid
> inclusion/exclusion is discussed properly according to the Apache Way.
It's fine when committers/contributors have private discussions related to
a feature they've been working on. Not everything should go through the dev
Yury, ML folks,
I've mentioned a strange thing. Looks like every example we have wraps up
its logic in the following block
IgniteThread igniteThread = new
IgniteThread(ignite.configuration().getIgniteInstanceName(),
KMeansClusterizationExample.class.getSimpleName(), () -> {
//ML specific
Hi Dmitriy and thanks for putting this out,
Ignite definition needs to be changed to this one
*Memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform
fortransactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering
in-memoryspeeds at petabyte scale*
Have no idea how to update
Thanks, Pavel and the rest of the Igniters involved.
That simple usability improvement is a big deal for those who use Ignite in
production.
Are we getting it in 2.7?
--
Denis
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:11 AM Dmitriy Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi Igniters,
>
> Thanks to everyone, who has participated
Enormous and outstanding addition!
Yuriy, I've talked to Akmal and he is happy to help with the documentation.
Please start documenting everything and reach out Akmal directly.
--
Denis
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:31 AM Юрий Бабак wrote:
> Hello Igniters,
>
> I want to make up some overview of
Igniters,
Don't we have experts in our networking component? I do believe that's a
small improvement that can be verified and merged quickly.
--
Denis
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 8:50 AM Dmitriy Pavlov
wrote:
> Igniters, Friendly reminder.
>
> Denis, could you advice how to proceed in this case?
Great addition, Yuriy!
Adding the "ignite-tensorflow" module makes total sense to me.
--
Denis
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:53 PM Юрий Бабак wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> For release 2.7 we will introduce integration between TensorFlow and Apache
> Ignite. This integration contains changes on
Hello Anton,
I would merge the contribution to "ignite-spring-session" module. Create
it. We already have "ignite-spring", "ignite-spring-date" modules and the
addition of one more looks natural.
--
Denis
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:31 AM Dmitriy Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> There is GitHub
Andrey K. and G.,
Thanks, do we have a documentation ticket created? Prachi (copied) can help
with the documentation.
--
Denis
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 5:51 AM Andrey Gura wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> finally your change is merged to master branch. Congratulations and
> thank you very much! :)
>
> I
nis,
>
> What is the point of these events, provided that we already has CACHE_PUT
> and CACHE_REMOVED?
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 1:01 AM Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > Hello Ivan,
> >
> > First of all, it looks like that EVT_CACHE_ENTRY_CREATED,
> > > EVT_C
Pavel,
Do you think we can get it fixed in 2.7 time frame?
--
Denis
-- Forwarded message -
From: Ilya Kasnacheev
Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: .NET java thread count keeps growing
To:
Hello!
I can observe the problem that you are describing. I have created
I would add a disclaimer or a prerequisite step. That what other companies
do if a user needs to do some basic installation steps. At least mention it.
--
Denis
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 3:04 PM Prachi Garg wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to explain me everything in such
Hello Yuri,
I might give useful feedback if see how the metrics will look like from the
API standpoint. If it's not difficult please create a draft.
AS for the interface, in addition to JMX and SQL we need to ensure Visor
CMD and Web Console gets updated. *Alex K.*, please join the thread and
Hello Ivan,
First of all, it looks like that EVT_CACHE_ENTRY_CREATED,
> EVT_CACHE_ENTRY_DESTROYED are legacy came from Ignite 1.x time and have a
> little value nowadays. Does anyone have something against deprecating them?
These events are used in a pure caching or in-memory data grid use
In general, I'm totally for the plan 2 - make sure Ignite works with Java
11 and release it in October. However, are we sure we'll be ready to adopt
JTA and Hibernate integrations? We can't release having them broken.
--
Denis
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:00 PM Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Igniters,
Val can be the final reviewer. He knows this component pretty well.
Val, could you help the guys with this?
--
Denis
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:14 AM Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> Nikolay,
>
> I'll perform prereview once PR will be ready.
> Then we'll need some time to fix all found issues.
>
aware of
> the benefits of such method (e.g. if RAM region is big enough, etc).
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> вт, 18 сент. 2018 г. в 21:36, Denis Magda :
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Since we're adding a method that would preload a certain partition, can
Folks,
Since we're adding a method that would preload a certain partition, can we
add the one which will preload the whole cache? Ignite persistence users
I've been working with look puzzled once they realize there is no way to
warm up RAM after the restart. There are use cases that require this.
gt; вт, 28 авг. 2018 г. в 4:19, Saikat Maitra :
>
> > Thank you so much Denis.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Saikat
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Saikat,
> > >
> > > Than
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9564:
---
Summary: Ignite K8 service and sticky session with AWS K8
deployments
Key: IGNITE-9564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9564
Project: Ignite
encryption keys for existing cache(key
> rotation procedure).
> This will be implemented in Phase 2.
>
> В Вт, 11/09/2018 в 23:41 -0400, Denis Magda пишет:
> > Nikolay,
> >
> > Could you please list the limitations of Phase 1? I'm curious what won't
> be
> > supported in 2.7.
>
made 2 rounds of review.
> > I planning to fix all issues with implementation in a few days.
> >
> >
> > В Вт, 11/09/2018 в 10:40 -0400, Denis Magda пишет:
> > > Hi Nikolay,
> > >
> > > Has anybody started looking into your request? As I understand the
Hi Nikolay,
Has anybody started looking into your request? As I understand the plan is
to get TDE Phase 1 released in 2.7, right?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=89067473
Could you also list what needs to be done at Phase 2 and how much time it
might take.
--
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9503:
---
Summary: Visor CMD shows wrong REPLICATED cache max size
Key: IGNITE-9503
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9503
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
A full list of doc tickets can be retrieved with the following filter in
JIRA:
project = Ignite AND component = documentation AND fixVersion = 2.7 AND
status not in (Resolved, Closed)
--
Denis
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:27 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> I've put togeth
Igniters,
I've put together a page with the most prominent capabilities that have to
be on our radar and must be documented *prior* to the release. Expand it if
anything is missing:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Required+Docs
A full list of doc tickets can be retrieved with
ll be available in Apache Ignite 2.7
>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
> вс, 2 сент. 2018 г. в 17:40, Denis Magda :
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > A user reported the issue on SO:
> >
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52117160/ignite-consumes-all-memory-and-fail
Amir, Anton,
How is dev/review process going? Is there any chance we get this capability
into 2.7?
--
Denis
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:27 PM Amir Akhmedov
wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> I checked your last comments in the ticket and left some responses. Please
> check them and let me know
>
> Thanks,
Igniters,
A user reported the issue on SO:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52117160/ignite-consumes-all-memory-and-fails-with-outofmemory-when-iterating-over-cache
Does it sound familiar? Were we fixing something like that before?
Please scan query and Ignite memory experts join the
Hello Saikat,
Hopefully, someone from the community will review the changes in the
nearest time.
--
Denis
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:37 PM Saikat Maitra
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The changes for IGNITE-3303 for IgniteSource is complete. This will help is
> streaming data from Ignite cluster and
Welcome Sergey! Added you to JIRA.
--
Denis
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:16 AM antonovsergey93
wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> I'd like to join to Apache Ignite development.
> Currently, I work on IGNITE-9438
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9438
>
> My Jira login is antonovsergey93
>
>
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite
has invited Dmitriy Govorukhin to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
submission process. This
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite
has invited Dmitriy Pavlov to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management
and to guide the direction of the project.
Congratulations Dmitriy! Keep
Val,
Sounds like a handy configuration option. I would allow setting a number of
retries. If the number is set to 0 then a failed update is discarded right
away.
--
Denis
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Is there a way to
Nikolay, Igniters, let me help you with the list.
That what I was tracking on my side (something we can announce). Don't have
a JIRA ticket for every ticket but CC-ed everyone who claimed to be in
charge. Nikolay, please work with the community members to add these
capabilities to the release
Hello Ravil and welcome to the community!
I've added you to the contributor's list in JIRA. Please feel free to take
over the tasks.
--
Denis
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:04 AM Ravil Galeyev wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'd like to join to Apache Ignite development.
> Especially to the ML part.
>
Hi Mikhail!
Done, welcome to the community!
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:52 AM Mikhail Petrov
wrote:
> I'm new to Ignite and I would like to join Apache Ignite development.
> My JIRA's login: PetrovMikhail
>
Hello Saikat,
Thanks for the article and contribution. We'll get it added to:
https://ignite.apache.org/blogs.html
--
Denis
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:59 PM Saikat Maitra
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently published blog on how we can stream data using Apache Ignite and
> Flink. This uses
Some of us have been doing meetups and workshops in San Francisco Bay Area
for a while but have never tried the hackathon format. Worth trying, thanks
for putting out the idea, Dmitriy!
Let's start with Russia first and then I can assist with the hackathon
arrangement here in the Silicon Valley.
a Kasnacheev
>
> 2018-08-24 2:56 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda :
>
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > Sounds terrific! Is this part of the following Ignite enhancement
> proposal?
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-
> > 20%3A+Data+Compression+in+Ignit
Hi Ilya,
Sounds terrific! Is this part of the following Ignite enhancement proposal?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-20%3A+Data+Compression+in+Ignite
--
Denis
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:17 AM Ilya Kasnacheev
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> My plan was to add a compression section to
Vladimir,
This ticket [1] can be closed, right? All the thing clients in Ignite 2.6
go with authentication capabilities.
However, not sure what's the status of the other task [2].
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6941
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6856
On
Hi Dmitry,
That's a BSD-3-Clause license if to believe this statement
"SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause":
https://github.com/pmem/llpl/blob/master/LICENSE
This license can be used with ASF software:
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
--
Denis
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at
I've removed the ARRAY data type from the supported list.
Regardless of this, Vova, could you answer to Dmiry's question?
--
Denis
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:28 AM Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> No, we do not support
Hi,
Please tell your JIRA id so that we grant required permissions.
--
Denis
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:59 PM SUMIT KESARWANI
wrote:
> Hi All,
> wanted to contribute in apache ignite project.
> i request to admin , please provide me the access for jira to assign issue
> for myself.
>
>
>
Hey, ML experts,
Here is an ML issue reported. Please have a look.
--
Denis
-- Forwarded message -
From: DocDVZ
Date: Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:53 AM
Subject: NPE exception in KMeansTrainer
To:
Hello,
Since I'm new to data science, I'm not really sure if it's a bug or wrong
.0/
>
> сб, 18 авг. 2018 г. в 3:51, Denis Magda :
>
>> Peter, Anton V, Igniters,
>>
>> The board communicated the following release policy changes:
>> -- for new releases :
>> -- you MUST supply a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512 file
>> -- you SHOUL
Peter, Anton V, Igniters,
The board communicated the following release policy changes:
-- for new releases :
-- you MUST supply a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512 file
-- you SHOULD NOT supply MD5 or SHA-1 files
Are we good? More details are below.
*2 Release Dist Policy Changes (Q?
> >
> > > > It is not an easy fix, so I'm not sure it is possible to do in 2.7.
> > > >
> > > > Offheap size is not reported by VM (it returns -1). To implement it
> we
> > > need
> > > > totally migrate off-heap memory metrics to
Igniters,
Was troubleshooting an Ignite deployment today and couldn't find out from
the logs what was the actual off-heap space used.
Those were the given memory resoures (Ignite 2.6):
[2018-08-16 15:07:49,961][INFO ][main][GridDiscoveryManager] Topology
snapshot [ver=1, servers=1, clients=0,
Denis Magda created IGNITE-9305:
---
Summary: Wrong off-heap size is reported for a node
Key: IGNITE-9305
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9305
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Please keep using JDK 8 for now. JDK 9/10/11 is planned to be fully
supported in the nearest time.
--
Denis
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:31 AM KJQ wrote:
> As a note, I downgraded all of the Docker containers to use JDK 9 (9.0.4)
> and
> I still get the same problem running the SpringBoot 2
JDK 10/11 is planned to be supported in the nearest time. Stay tuned.
--
Denis
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:47 AM KJQ wrote:
> Added the exports to the SpringBoot plugin seem to work for me in addition
> to
> having them in my compiler and surefire plugins...it at least starts up
> Ignite and I
Hello Luqman,
That's an excellent plugin! Copying the dev list so that everyone knows.
--
Dneis
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 3:08 PM luqmanahmad wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I was working on a project which required a very large number of
> cluster over 700 nodes and we were encountering with
Pavel,
Could you please look into this issue? Guess we've got the first Node.JS
user even before it was officially released.
--
Denis
-- Forwarded message -
From: Eran Betzalel (JIRA)
Date: Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:53 AM
Subject: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9258) NodeJS - Fail to
Igor,
I think it's reasonable to add the baseline topology APIs to C++. Can you
plan this for the nearest releases?
Pave, do you have time to do the same for .Net?
--
Denis
-- Forwarded message -
From: aealexsandrov
Date: Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:23 AM
Subject: Re: how ignite
vel Tupitsyn
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Denis,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply. I'm on vacation with limited internet access.
>> I think I can do this next week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Pavel
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:17 AM Denis Magda wrote:
&
Hello Evgeniy,
What is PureJavaCrc32 used for in Ignite? Is it on a critical path
somewhere?
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:08 PM Евгений Станиловский
wrote:
> Hi, igniters, i wrote a simple bench, looks like PureJavaCrc32 has
> performance problems in compatible with zip.CRC32.
>
>
Vladimir,
Could you step in? How should we update our docs and what are the steps to
add Arrays support to the project? I thought this worked all the times.
--
Denis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:55 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Thanks for a comments.
>
> Should we update documentation and remove
Alexey, are you working on some new ML/DL APIs/algorithms? Please elaborate
what you'd like to add to Ignite.
--
Denis
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:10 PM Pavel Kovalenko wrote:
> Hello Alexey,
>
> It's not so difficult to implement new type of indexing of data, but if you
> want to reach
Hi Deepa,
What is your use case? There might be a solution.
--
Denis
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:44 AM Deepa Kolwalkar
wrote:
> Hi
>
> While searching for a solution on how to have DB updates to reflect
> automatically in Ignite Cache, I came across this post dt Mar-2018 which
> states that :
>
e refactoring first, and then more
> >> complicated one in phase 2.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus, my suggestion is:
> >>>> — find and update all hardcoded “fabric
Dmitriy,
I would suggest us not limiting blobs use case to a dedicated cache. If to
look at other databases they usually have BLOB/LONGBLOB/etc. as a type
meaning that users mix simple and BLOB types in the same tables.
Should we start with Ignite SQL adding blobs through its APIs?
--
Denis
On
t; >>>>>>>> D.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Since you proposing patc
wrote:
> Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation for build
> configuration changes.
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> > >
> > > With which one — current implementation in issue?
> >
> >
> > That's the answe
Hey Pavel,
Could you help to update Ignite definition in accordance to the website?
.NET docs [1] and NuGet [2] packages define it as In-Memory Data Fabric and
data grid.
The definition needs to be updated to the following:
- Project name - Apache Ignite
- Definition - Apache Ignite is a
Hello folks,
The documentation goes with a small reference about _key and _val usage,
and only for Ignite SQL APIs (Java, Net, C++). I tried to clean up all the
documentation code snippets.
As for the GitHub examples, they require a major overhaul. Instead of _key
and _val usage, we need to use
Nikolay,
Do you need 8u111 and later? Or any JDK 8 works for you?
--
Denis
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 6:55 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Hello, Petr.
>
> > What JDK is required for running this build?
>
> 8u111 and later.
>
> > I can filter agents with correct JDK for now.
>
> Encryption tests are
Hello Nikolay,
This is a great news!
Vladimir O., as far as I understand you will be reviewing the contribution,
won't you?
--
Denis
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:16 AM Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> TDE. Phase 1 [1] is ready for review [2].
>
> I meet some corner cases during
;
> > > > сб, 21 июл. 2018 г. в 3:28, Pavel Petroshenko >:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Denis, Nikolay,
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposed 2.7 release timing sounds reasonable to me.
> > > > > Python [1], PHP [2], and N
901 - 1000 of 3093 matches
Mail list logo
