Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8626:
---
Summary: ODBC: Can not compile ODBC with OpenSSL 1.1
Key: IGNITE-8626
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8626
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Well, all other clients have the same version as Ignite.
Are there any reasons to make a Node.js client some
kind of a special case?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Pavel Petroshenko
1. Sounds OK for me.
2. Since Node.js client is going to be included in Ignite releases,
I guess it make sense to align its version with the version of
Ignite, i.e. 2.6, etc...
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Pavel Petroshenko
wrote:
>
Re-sending to dev-list.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 6:02 PM, zhouxy1123 wrote:
> Dose Iginte implement lock and latch in transaction,and where is the code ?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
By the way, Alexandr,
Do you want to donate your client to Apache Ignite, so we
are going to include it in our release, or would you prefer
keep it separate?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Aleksandr,
> I'm curre
> platforms/dotnet/Apache.Ignite.Core/Client/IIgniteClient.cs
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Guru Stron <gurustronpub...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > Nice one!
> >
> > On 16 May 2018 at 11:26, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wro
I totally agree. There is no sense in most cases in deletion
of commentaries.
There is even less sense, when you can look into ticket
history and see all the removed comments anyway.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Dmitry Pavlov
wrote:
> Hi
gt; > > are
> > > > > to stay with XML if switching to another configuration format
> > requires
> > > > > significant effort.
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, first time I heard about JSON from [1] : " JSON is like XML,
t; wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > That's a valid point. Will see how it goes. As for the new documentation
> > engine, there are no more arguments. We will try to migrate within 2.6.
> > Just need to find more contributors who would help with this.
> >
> > --
&
kse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Igor,
>
> Just get one of the config samples and translate it directly to YAML:
> XML - https://pastebin.com/wtQXXq8f
> YAML - https://pastebin.com/akGu3e81
>
> 2018-05-15 18:49 GMT+03:00 Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>:
>
> >
aspect
> > > and this task is out of product scope.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> > > <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I still do not understand *why* do we need to add additi
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8495:
---
Summary: CPP Thin: Implement thin client start and connection
establishment
Key: IGNITE-8495
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8495
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8494:
---
Summary: CPP Thin: Implement Thin CPP client
Key: IGNITE-8494
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8494
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New Feature
I don't think we need to add new formats on server side as there may
be a lot of different formats for different clients. On the other hand,
supporting additional formats may be non trivial and error-prone, while
adding little to a user experience.
For clients, I see no problem in adding for
t; Maybe worth to add type registration functionality:
>> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS)
>> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS)
>>
>> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes,
Hello Igniters,
I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features
availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development
of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state
of clients.
Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some
mistakes,
Alexey,
I've checked out the code. Looks good to me. Great job!
What about data types support? I can see Timestamp.
Are you planning to implement other types, e.g. Decimal,
Guid?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> On Fri,
BSENT
> >>> OP_CACHE_GET_ALL
> >>> OP_CACHE_PUT_ALL
> >>> OP_CACHE_GET_AND_PUT
> >>> OP_CACHE_GET_AND_REPLACE
> >>> OP_CACHE_GET_AND_REMOVE
> >>> OP_CACHE_GET_AND_PUT_IF_ABSENT
> >>> OP_CACHE_REPLACE
> >>>
Looks like a good idea to me.
But I believe, if we decide to adopt this idea, then we
need to think how to enforce adding notes to migration
guide.
The only way I can currently think of is a pretty obvious
one - adding corresponding instructions to a wiki [1].
Is there anything else we can do
Cool, I've cherry-picked it to ignite-2.5 from master.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:48 PM, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> wrote:
> Igor,
>
> Feel free to target ticket to 2.5 release.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Igor Sapego <isa
Hi guys,
I also have fix for a critical bug [1] which I'd like to include
in this release. It is OK?
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8394
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Andrey Gura wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> looks like painful problem. I've
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8394:
---
Summary: ODBC: Can not establish SSL connection to remote host.
Key: IGNITE-8394
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8394
Project: Ignite
Issue
Aleksandr,
Great job! Do you have any plans on adding new features to
your client?
Pavel,
There are also CacheGet and CachePut [1] operations, as
far as I can see.
[1] -
https://github.com/amsokol/ignite-go-client/blob/master/binary/v1/client.go#L120
Best Regards,
Igor
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018
gt; I removed files you mentioned and got following error messages:
> > > >
> > > > make[3]: вход в каталог «/home/dragon/src/ignite/
> modules/platforms/cpp/odbc-test»
> > > > CXXLDignite-odbc-tests
> > > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/../../../
gt; boost::unit_test::unit_test_log.set_formatter(new JetBrains::
> TeamcityBoostLogFormatter());
>
> Do I need some additional team city library for tets?
> Can tests for odbc be executed locally?
>
> В Ср, 18/04/2018 в 16:29 +0300, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > I think it is better to rem
OTES?
> Should we add some readme to setup development environment for CPP module?
>
> В Ср, 18/04/2018 в 16:11 +0300, Igor Sapego пишет:
> > Hi, Nikolay,
> >
> > 1. Yes, it's OK;
> > 2. Well, it is the old issue that we are working only with the specifi
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8310:
---
Summary: CPP: Remove strong dependency on Boost 1.58.0
Key: IGNITE-8310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8310
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Hi, Nikolay,
1. Yes, it's OK;
2. Well, it is the old issue that we are working only with the specific
Boost version (1.58.0). You can try commenting out the following line:
#include
in teamcity_boost.cpp files to make it working with your version.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at
the server C++ runtime.
>
> Hope that all makes sense. I’m happy to contribute to this effort.
>
> Take care,
> Lucas
>
> --
> Lucas BEELER
> Technical Consultant, Professional Services
> GridGain Systems
> www.gridgain.com
>
> > On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:02 AM, Igor
t for 2.6 release? It shouldn't be time-consuming to support
> it, right?
>
> --
> Denis
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:48 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I've created a ticket: [1]
> >
> > [1] - https://issues
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8273:
---
Summary: CPP: Implement AffinityRun and AffinityCall Compute
methods
Key: IGNITE-8273
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8273
Project: Ignite
Guys,
I've created a ticket: [1]
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8273
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a ticket? Let's create one if not.
>
> -Val
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:17 AM,
Hi,
Well, Dmitry has said he's going to merge it in 3-4 days 2 days ago,
so I guess, the merge is going to happen in 1-2 days or so.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Роман Меерсон wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As i see everything is awesome and there is no
ODBC uses semicolon and this semantics are defined by ODBC specification.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Vladimir, Igor,
>
> Shouldn't we do the same for ODBC?
>
> --
> Denis
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8150:
---
Summary: Fix suite [Prepare Vote #1] .Net & C++
Key: IGNITE-8150
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8150
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8013:
---
Summary: CPP: Check pending snapshots in
BinaryTypeManager::GetHandler
Key: IGNITE-8013
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8013
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-8012:
---
Summary: CPP: BinaryWriter::WriteElement should accept const
reference instead of value.
Key: IGNITE-8012
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8012
Id=73631266
> >
> > In 30 clean runs, there was 371 failed tests, 21 suites. During previous
> > mass run there were 804 tests including 355 C ++, suites 29. This
> indicate
> > progress, but still there is a lot of work to be done.
> >
> > Thanks to Alexey Gonchar
Hi Igniters,
There is a job on Apache Jenkins for nightly builds of Ignite [1],
which was useful for providing fast fixes to our users. However,
it seems that noone supports it any more as the last successfull
build date is 31.05.2017.
Does anyone know what is the issue with the job and why it
In C++ there are no tests that use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder. There
are examples, though, that use it. As far as I know, currently all examples
use TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder, and there were some objections
against using VmIpFinder instead.
Am I right, folks?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Mon,
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7825:
---
Summary: ODBC: Update specification documentation
Key: IGNITE-7825
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7825
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7811:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement connection fail over
Key: IGNITE-7811
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7811
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Well, I agree with Pavel here. To me looks like this feature gives
a little to a user, as they need to write all the same amount of code
as they would need to if there was no this feature. It also will produce
some new issues with the "hanging" of operations, while thin client
tries and fails to
> Igor,
>
> Why it might be not enough to have ssl_enabled=[true | false]? Could you
> give an example since you’ve already did a research?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Jan 26, 2018, at 6:08 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
org> wrote:
> This configuration approach looks clearer to me. +1 for it.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 20, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, then how about the following set of options:
> >
> > ssl
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7362:
---
Summary: ODBC: Third party libraries truncate any inserted varlen
data to ColumnSize
Key: IGNITE-7362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7362
Project
Also, considering case-insensitivity issue, we need to choose
some encoding that only uses upper or lower case letters in
encoding result.
By the way, such encoding will resolve cache name clashes
due to case-insensitivity issue.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Igor Sapego
I personally like a Pavel's suggestion - base64 encoding seems like
a good solution, while string hashes will arise a collision issue.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Petr Ivanov wrote:
> Special characters banning seems to be exclusive way and cannot
There are also some international features that you might want to
address. For example, instead of backslash some other characters
may be used on Windows - ¥ on the Japanese version, ₩ on the
Korean version.
See [1] for more info.
Here is the citation:
Security Considerations for Character Sets
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7189:
---
Summary: ODBC: ODBC return weird names for tables created with DDL
Key: IGNITE-7189
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7189
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7151:
---
Summary: CPP: Get rid of code duplication in JNI library
Key: IGNITE-7151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7151
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-7143:
---
Summary: CPP: Can not insert zero decimal value with the ODBC
driver.
Key: IGNITE-7143
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7143
Project: Ignite
Hi Denis,
I've been working on SSL support for ODBC [1] for a while now, and I hope
to include it in 2.4, as well as some other minor improvements and bug fixes
for ODBC.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6810
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:51 AM, vveider
It is in a drop-down list that appears when you click on your
name, not where you are looking for it.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 1:02 AM, techbysample wrote:
> Denis,
>
> Up on logging in, I do not see the Admin panel that you described.
>
> I have attached a
v 7, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > Thanks for the clarification. Please file a ticket if nobody else shares
> a
> > feedback soon.
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 7, 2017, at 1:23
Hello,
Please, add checks for success of the operations so we can
understand what is the problem. Please, check result of serealization,
deserialisation, and command sending.
Please, also note that this check is not going to work as intended, because
size_t is unsigned type:
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6841:
---
Summary: ODBC: Add new version for multiple result set
functionality
Key: IGNITE-6841
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6841
Project: Ignite
explain the difference between “allow, prefer and require” modes?
>
> BTW, do we really need to have the “disable” one? Guess that having
> ssl_mode set to “disable” will have the same effect as not setting the
> ssl_mode at all.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 3, 2017, a
Hi, Igniters,
I'm going to start working on the SSL support for the ODBC
connection and I need to hear your opinion.
For the client side I'm going to use OpenSSL library [1], which is
standard de-facto for C/C++ applications. Unfortunately its
licence is not fully compatible with Apache Licence,
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6810:
---
Summary: ODBC: Add secure connection support
Key: IGNITE-6810
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6810
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: New Feature
+1
1. Building C++ from binary release - OK.
2. Building C++ examples - OK.
3. Building ODBC from binary release - OK.
4. ODBC installers - OK.
5. Building C++ from source release - OK.
6. Building ODBC from source release - OK.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Alexey
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6765:
---
Summary: ODBC: Error when closing executed DML statement.
Key: IGNITE-6765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6765
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Error codes are different for ODBC and JDBC.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Alex P, Vladimir,
>
> Please confirm that the error codes documented for JDBC [1] driver are
> shared by all SQL APIs we have. If it’s so I would create
Here is the link for the ticket [1] If someone else was wandering
about what kind of optimization we are talking.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6024
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> We
Hi guys,
Lately I've been wondering about adding SSL to our ODBC driver.
Of course I'm not going to write my own SSL implementation from
the scratch, and going to use third-party library for that instead.
OpenSSL library is the standard de-facto for implementation of SSL
connectivity, but it uses
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6594:
---
Summary: Add lazy flag to the list of the ODBC connection string
attributes.
Key: IGNITE-6594
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6594
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6593:
---
Summary: Document C and SQL types, supported by ODBC driver.
Key: IGNITE-6593
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6593
Project: Ignite
Issue
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6592:
---
Summary: Describe Ignite C++ pointer reading and writing semantics
Key: IGNITE-6592
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6592
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6468:
---
Summary: ODBC: Add tests for SQLGetInfo
Key: IGNITE-6468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6468
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
p 20, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I've filed a ticket for that: [1]
> >
> > [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6456
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Vladi
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6456:
---
Summary: Add flags to ClientConnectorConfiguration which
enable/disable different clients
Key: IGNITE-6456
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6456
t;
> > This way users will also have better understanding of the
> > ClientConnectorConfiguration purpose.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Igniters,
> > >
> > > In current approac
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6455:
---
Summary: Add flags to ClientConnectorConfiguration which
enable/disable different clients
Key: IGNITE-6455
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6455
Hi, Igniters,
In current approach, ODBC, thin JDBC and thin .NET client all connect
to the grid using ClientListenerProcessor, which listen on a single port.
The problem is that there is currently no way to disable only one client.
For example, currently you can't disallow thin JDBC driver
Wait, there is no platforms\cpp\bin directory with odbc
installers in binary release. Can someone double-check?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Checked:
> - Building of x86 and amd64 versions of C++ bina
+1
Checked:
- Building of x86 and amd64 versions of C++ binaries.
- Building of x86 and amd64 versions of ODBC.
- C++ examples.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Andrey Gura wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Kozlov Maxim
Igniters,
There is one more fix I would propose to include into 2.2: [1]. It has
been fixed a while ago and it is critical for C++ users that would like
to make use of persistence store, as currently they need to have
separate Java node just to activate cluster.
What do you think?
[1] -
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6211:
---
Summary: ODBC: SQLBindParameter should not unbind parameter if the
ParameterValuePtr is NULL
Key: IGNITE-6211
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6211
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6188:
---
Summary: ODBC: SQLSQLFreeStmt failing if called before all the
rows from the result set were fetched.
Key: IGNITE-6188
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6188
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6162:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement support for multiple result sets
Key: IGNITE-6162
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6162
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6159:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement SQLStatistics
Key: IGNITE-6159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6159
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6158:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement proper support of SQLPrimaryKeys
Key: IGNITE-6158
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6158
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6156:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement SQL_ATTR_QUERY_TIMEOUT statement attribute
Key: IGNITE-6156
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6156
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6153:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement SQLCancel
Key: IGNITE-6153
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6153
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Improvement
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6151:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement SQL_ATTR_CONNECTION_DEAD connection
attribute
Key: IGNITE-6151
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6151
Project: Ignite
RN ret = SQLExecDirect(stmt, query, queryLen);
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Igor, thanks a lot. Appreciate this!
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Aug 18, 2017, at 8:56 AM, Igor Sapego &l
ironment is set up on your side.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Aug 17, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Akmal,
> >
> > I work on the ODBC driver and would be glad to help. You can send
> > mails with your requests to d
Denis,
Ok, I've filed a ticket [1] and will take a look.
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6112
Best Regards,
Igor
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> Denis, it will be helpful to also file a ticket on this.
>
> On Thu, Aug 17,
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6112:
---
Summary: Review and update C++ documentation according to new
features.
Key: IGNITE-6112
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6112
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6099:
---
Summary: ODBC: Implement SQLGetInfo for all info types
Key: IGNITE-6099
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6099
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Akmal,
I work on the ODBC driver and would be glad to help. You can send
mails with your requests to devlist and I will try to help as much as I
can.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Akmal Chaudhri wrote:
> When I have the opportunity to test
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6081:
---
Summary: .NET: Cannot get from cache values which were stored in
cache with PutAll.
Key: IGNITE-6081
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6081
Project
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-6032:
---
Summary: ODBC: SQLGetData should return SQL_SUCCESS if called on
NULL column
Key: IGNITE-6032
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6032
Project: Ignite
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-5995:
---
Summary: ODBC: SQLGetData gets data for the next row instead of
current
Key: IGNITE-5995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5995
Project: Ignite
e plans to get closer to 100% compliance?
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Igor,
> >
> > Vary cool!
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
Hi Igniters,
I've updated an ODBC API conformance page - [1],
so take a look if you are interested.
Also, make sure you edit this page if you are adding
new features, or modifying existing features of the Ignite
ODBC driver.
[1] - https://apacheignite.readme.io/v2.1/docs/conformance
Best
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-5923:
---
Summary: ODBC: SQLGetTypeInfo does not work with SQL_ALL_TYPES
Key: IGNITE-5923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5923
Project: Ignite
Issue
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-5900:
---
Summary: CPP: Add tests for CREATE/DROP table/index for C++ and
ODBC
Key: IGNITE-5900
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5900
Project: Ignite
itriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Just a note from the platforms guy:
> >
> > Solution with table-level configuration is going to be significantly
> > harder
Just a note from the platforms guy:
Solution with table-level configuration is going to be significantly
harder to implement for platforms and ODBC then field-level one.
Also, what about binary objects, which are not stored in cache,
but being marshalled?
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Jul 26,
301 - 400 of 611 matches
Mail list logo