Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-12 Thread Mikhail Petrov
PR [0] was updated. Scope of Ignite and dependencies has been set to "provided". Could someone take a look, please? [0] - https://github.com/apache/ignite-extensions/pull/28 On 12.11.2020 11:53, Alexey Goncharuk wrote: Yes, the idea is correct. I cannot vouch for the ignite-spring-data

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-12 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Yes, the idea is correct. I cannot vouch for the ignite-spring-data extension because I do not know whether there are maintenance releases for each of the sprint-data-[2.0, 2.1, 2.2] streams. If spring-data-2.0.x is no longer supported, then definitely we should be good to release it once and move

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-11 Thread Mikhail Petrov
Alexey, Did I understand you correctly? For each new version of any extension, the minimum Ignite version and the minimum version of will be explicitly specified in the release notes/documentation. It is also assumed that due to backward compatibility users can safely use this extension

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-11 Thread Nikolay Izhikov
+1 to make extensions as independent as possible. Doubt if we can do it for each module. We have, ignite-hibernate_4.2, ignite-hibernate_5.1 modules that attached to specific hibernate version by their name. > 11 нояб. 2020 г., в 11:19, Alexey Goncharuk > написал(а): > > Hello Mikhail, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-11 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Hello Mikhail, I see that now only Ignite dependencies are marked as 'provided', however, it makes sense to move all libraries being integrated to the 'provided' scope (for example, the Apache Camel dependency for camel-ext and so on). This is how it is currently done for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-11-10 Thread Mikhail Petrov
Igniters, It seems that we came to decision on change of Ignite dependency scopes to "provided". Don't we? The corresponding ticket [1] is ready to final review. Saikat Maitra have already reviewed and approved PR [2]. Could some committer take a final look? [1] -

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-10-28 Thread Saikat Maitra
Hi Alex, Yes, we can start releasing the extensions modules. I would like to also help in releasing a few extensions, it will also help me to be familiarized with the release process. Mikhail and I have been having discussion about whether we should use provided scope for dependencies or shall

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-10-28 Thread Denis Magda
Alex, Should we create a dedicated ticket for the documentation changes or can we reuse IGNITE-13634? As a bare minimum, we need to update maven artifacts' names and versions: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/docs/_docs/extensions-and-integrations - Denis On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at

[DISCUSS] Release Ignite streamer extensions

2020-10-28 Thread Alexey Goncharuk
Igniters, Since Ignite 2.9 has been released, I think we can now release the extension modules related to streaming. I noticed that unlike spring autoconfigure, the streamer extensions dependencies do not have provided scope, so I created a ticket to fix that [1]. Anything else we should fix