Thanks, Chandresh, for pointing this out. We also have benchmark results,
which look very different:
https://ignite.apache.org/benchmarks/ignite-vs-hazelcast.html
The main issue here, is that the shown results are for HZ 3.6, which has
not been released yet. I suspect that they have done some per
My team uses Hazelcast for in memory data grid. i am also wanted to do
comparison with ignite and publish result sometime in next month.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote:
> > Was this in or off heap test?
>
> That'
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 07:36PM, Kostya Kulagin wrote:
> Was this in or off heap test?
That's exactly why I asked the OP to share his thoughts - otherwise, it is
just a slightly amusing reading at best ;)
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > It is pretry cool to se
Was this in or off heap test?
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing
> themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the
> in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache
It is pretry cool to see companies out there using Ignite and comparing
themselves to Iginite. That clearly sets Ignite as the poster child of the
in-memory computing. And that's exactly what an Apache project should be.
Thanks for sharing!
But perhaps you wanted to also express some thoughts b
https://hazelcast.com/resources/benchmark-gridgain/
--
Chandresh Pancholi
Senior Software Engineer
Flipkart.com
Email-id:chandresh.panch...@flipkart.com
Contact:08951803660
