Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

P.S. Forgot to attach the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14932 Regards, Nikita чт, 15 июл. 2021 г. в 15:34, Nikita Safonov : > Hey guys! > > Could you please also cherry pick the changes below to the 2.11 > documentation? > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9181 > > Re

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hey guys! Could you please also cherry pick the changes below to the 2.11 documentation? https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9181 Regards, Nikita пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 16:46, Nikita Safonov : > Hi guys! > > Alexey, I do confirm that some of the issues are already resolved (for > example, IGNIT

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi guys! Alexey, I do confirm that some of the issues are already resolved (for example, IGNITE-14658 is already documented). What is more, some of the tickets seem to be minor or "very internal" things that do not change the behaviour/are not a

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Alexey, Some of these tickets are already documented. Do we need to clear the "Docs Required" flag if documentation for the ticket has been merged to the master and release branch? AFAIK we didn't do that for previous releases. пн, 5 июл. 2021 г. в 13:53, Alexey Gidaspov : > Hi, Nikita! > > As I

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, Nikita! As I can see, these are the tickets we need to document [1] Can you tell me how long it will take to complete work on documentation? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20'Ignite'%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20('2.11')%20AND

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Guys, I've created the following ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15046 Please feel free to comment or edit it. If there are no objections, I'll create a PR soon. Regards, Nikita чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:54, Nikita Safonov : > Ivan, thank you for the links! > > Well, I can s

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Ivan, thank you for the links! Well, I can still find the docs on Python Thin Client under the "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" in 2.10: https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/thin-clients/python-thin-client So, I can replace the contents of "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" page with a li

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Nikita, What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why should we remove them? чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky : > Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some mistakes in this article) чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky : > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10 > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г.,

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10 чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov : > Hi guys! > > Sorry, totally missed this email. > > I can do this right away. > > Just a couple of questions first: > > [1]

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi guys! Sorry, totally missed this email. I can do this right away. Just a couple of questions first: [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following articles: Thin Clients Thin Clients Overview Java Thin Client .NET Thin Client C++ Thin Client Python Thin Client PHP Thi

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, Nikita! Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we can start with it? On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov wrote: > Hello Igniters! > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work. > I'll be glad to help with this. > And I'll be happy to know the sco

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

I suppose that python thin client documentation should be removed, only link to actual readthedocs.io documentation should remain пт, 11 июн. 2021 г., 14:01 Игорь Гусев : > > Hello all. > > I’d also join in on Nikita’s question n what docs are required for > release. Currently we only have one do

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hello Igniters! I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work. I'll be glad to help with this. And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to document. Regards, Nikita пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>: > hello, > > can someone can help to mer

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

hello, can someone can help to merge the following patch into master? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852 This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it is a valuable one. 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道: Sure, thanks for your reply Folks, could you pleas

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Sure, thanks for your reply Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account integration for non-committers? For the page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11 I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not sufficient. Can wiki admins set up smt

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear there are chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it. On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > ok, Maksim, keep us posted. > > We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance )) > > On 2021/06/03 14

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

ok, Maksim, keep us posted. We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a chance )) On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin wrote: > > Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it > is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. > > Hi, Dmit

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to release it within the next release. On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi Alexey, > >

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi Alexey, Releasing master as-is makes sence for me. Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on readiness. I guess if it is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a big deal, but still makes sense to start discuss

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

:scope: Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache Ignite 2.11 release Let's start discussion [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20u

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, Ilya! I've picked it. On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:04 PM Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > Hello! > > I have found a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781 > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > пт, 21 мая 2021 г. в 15:30, Maksim Timonin : > > > Hi, Andrey! > > > > Phase 1 deliv

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hello! I have found a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781 Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 21 мая 2021 г. в 15:30, Maksim Timonin : > Hi, Andrey! > > Phase 1 delivers complete query functionality. So users will get the API to > query indexes and can start to use it. Thi

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, Andrey! Phase 1 delivers complete query functionality. So users will get the API to query indexes and can start to use it. This functionality is not supposed to be changed in the next phases. I think there could be changes in the internal part that can affect performance of queries in next ste

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Maksim, why do you want to include just one phase of functionality into release instead of full implementation? History of Ignie development shows (at least from my point of view) that it is bad practice. As result users will have unfinished and badly tested functionality. We have (or had in the p

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, Dmitriy! I suggest this timeline Scope Freeze: May 31, 2021 Code Freeze: 14 June, 2021 Voting Date: 21 June, 2021 Release Date: 28 June, 2021 пт, 14 мая 2021 г. в 11:32, Maksim Timonin : > Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the next AI > release. Currently there

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi, I'd like to include Phase 1 of index queries feature [1] to the next AI release. Currently there are 2 tickets in progress ([2], [3]), and they will be ready for review next week. What is a time of code freeze if it's going to release AI 2.11 at the end of June? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/co

Re: Apache Ignite 2.11

Hi Alexey, :pmc to sign distribution: Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so part of activities should be picked up by committer and PMC member. If noone else want to help you here, I would. :timeline: And, could you estimate all phases of the release. :scope: I guess we can j