Re: New SQL execution engine

Nikolay, The document you edited is wrong (and outdated). Since the author meant another idea, I decided not to change IEP-35 and create a new one - IEP-37 (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/NBLABw). It's already have a number of key requirements. Regards, Igor вт, 1 окт. 2019 г., 6:14

Re: Unassigned issue IGNITE-12174

Thank you for the reply. Quoting Alexei Scherbakov : Lucene and spatial indexes do not support persistence. This is known limitation which would probably be addressed in the future releases. I think this limitation should at least be mentioned in the documentation then:

Re: Improvements for new security approach.

Folks, Could you please create a slack channel to discuss this in an effective way? On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:36 PM Denis Garus wrote: > >>As a result, you can't load security on demand. > > Why? > What is the difference between sending SecurityContext with every job's > request and sending

Re: Improvements for new security approach.

There is the #ignite-security Slack channel; we can use it for discussion. вт, 1 окт. 2019 г. в 09:14, Anton Vinogradov : > Folks, > > Could you please create a slack channel to discuss this in an effective > way? > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:36 PM Denis Garus wrote: > > > >>As a result, you

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12250) Adds REST requests processing logging.

PetrovMikhail created IGNITE-12250: -- Summary: Adds REST requests processing logging. Key: IGNITE-12250 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12250 Project: Ignite Issue Type:

Re: Unassigned issue IGNITE-12174

Hi Jan, You are right. I remember that we discussed to do similar for TEXT queries [1]. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12190 вт, 1 окт. 2019 г. в 12:07, : > > Thank you for the reply. > > Quoting Alexei Scherbakov : > > Lucene and spatial indexes do not support persistence. >

Re: Ignite community is building Calcite-based prototype

Guys, The better link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-37%3A+New+query+execution+engine Almost everything you may see by the link is the same as Drill guys already did, the

Re: Ignite community is building Calcite-based prototype

Hi Igor, I agree that it should be rather similar to what Drill did as distributed computing also is a big concern for Ignite, I guess, right? Julian Am 01.10.19, 15:06 schrieb "Seliverstov Igor" : Guys, The better link:

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Hi, you could find here ML tickets that should be resolved in the Ignite 2.8 (Umbrella tickets, bugs, minor improvements, integration tests via examples)

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Igniters, Here is the list of activities we've agreed on to prepare the Apache Ignite 2.8 release. 1. Preliminary release dates with the ability to shift them if some of the planned activities will not be finalized. But anyway we should build our engagement based on these dates. Scope Freeze:

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12251) Calcite exchange rules

Igor Seliverstov created IGNITE-12251: - Summary: Calcite exchange rules Key: IGNITE-12251 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12251 Project: Ignite Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12252) Runtime exceptions during rebalancing should be handled

Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-12252: -- Summary: Runtime exceptions during rebalancing should be handled Key: IGNITE-12252 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12252 Project: Ignite

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12253) [ML] Refactor current hierarchy of ML exeptions

Alexey Zinoviev created IGNITE-12253: Summary: [ML] Refactor current hierarchy of ML exeptions Key: IGNITE-12253 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12253 Project: Ignite

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Igniters! Do we want to have full JDK 11 support (compile and run) this release? Or should we postpone it until at least 3.0? > On 1 Oct 2019, at 17:19, Alexey Zinoviev wrote: > > Hi, you could find here > > ML tickets that should be resolved in the Ignite 2.8 (Umbrella tickets, > bugs,

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Alexey, Thank you for setting up the right issue statuses. I've updated the list of components we are waiting for [1]. Please, check that I've not missed anything. One more thing: I propose to exclude `minor' priority issues from that list or mark them `major`. WDYT? [1]

[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-12254) IO errors during write header of WAL files in FSYNC mode should be handled by failure handler

Aleksey Plekhanov created IGNITE-12254: -- Summary: IO errors during write header of WAL files in FSYNC mode should be handled by failure handler Key: IGNITE-12254 URL:

Re: Ignite community is building Calcite-based prototype

Hi Julian, Nice to e-meet you and thanks for being ready to help! Hopefully, the Ignite community will be able to contribute valuable changes back to Calcite as part of this activity - "pay good for good" :) You are right that distributed computing, massive-parallel processing, and

Re: Apache Ignite 2.8 RELEASE [Time, Scope, Manager]

Alexey Z., Could you please answer some of the questions > - IGNITE-11942 IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator Discontinuation [2]. > Probably should be moved to the next release due to dependency on > Tensorflow. Need to check. (Andrey Gura) Can we decouple Tensorflow from the IGFS? Mark all the

Re: ApacheCon North America 2020, project participation

Hello Rich, Please count on the Apache Ignite community. We'll collect topics and find those who will be able to present at the NA event. - Denis On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 9:37 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > Hi, folks, > > (Note: You're receiving this email because you're on the dev@ list for > one or

ApacheCon North America 2020, project participation

Hi, folks, (Note: You're receiving this email because you're on the dev@ list for one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) For ApacheCon North America 2019, we asked projects to participate in the creation of project/topic specific tracks. This was very successful, with about 15

Re: [IGNITE-9836] Invalid check of ea java versions

Hello! Thank you, I have merged both. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пт, 27 сент. 2019 г. в 14:36, Stephen Darlington < stephen.darling...@gridgain.com>: > Done: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6920 > > While we’re talking about the startup scripts… >