Hello guys,
I've implemented affinity awareness support for java thin client [1]. There
is only client-side affected by the patch. Can anyone review the change?
1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11898
ср, 13 мар. 2019 г. в 22:54, Pavel Tupitsyn :
> Default value for boolean
Pavel Tupitsyn created IGNITE-12294:
---
Summary: .NET Inspections failure on TC
Key: IGNITE-12294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12294
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Igniters,
I published a document about Binary format in cwiki [1]. Please share
your feedback. I feel that there is a lack of pictures on the page.
Need to figure out what aspects will be more clear with pictures.
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Binary+object+format
--
Sergey Kalashnikov created IGNITE-12295:
---
Summary: Faster index eviction
Key: IGNITE-12295
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12295
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Sub-task
Did a partial review, left one comment on the PR.
We need another pair of eyes on this for sure.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:34 AM Alex Plehanov
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>
> I've implemented affinity awareness support for java thin client [1]. There
> is only client-side affected by the patch. Can
Ivan, thank you for documenting this functionality, agree with Pavel here.
I think this document is a good starting point and contains a lot of
low-level details and great examples but from my perspective it doesn't
show how binary objects fit into a broader picture.
It worth adding higher-level
Ilya Kasnacheev created IGNITE-12296:
Summary: Implement Log Throttle in .Net and print warning for
unsafe PutAll ops.
Key: IGNITE-12296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12296
Pavel, Sergey,
Thank you for your feedback!
To be exact the document does not describe broad picture (including
metadata exchange) and is not a formal format specification
intentionally. I wanted to create a lightweight article giving an
intuition about binary object structure to a reader. And
Ivan, great job, thanks for putting this together.
I think we also need a more formal description of the format, including
binary metadata exchange mechanics.
It was done (partially) for IEP-9 Thin Client Protocol, we should probably
copy from there:
Hi all!
Based on the discussions most probably this is going to be on another
GitHub repo. Therefore I will prepare a standalone project with the Pub/Sub
module and once the repository is created a pull request shall be issued.
If there is anything else I can do in order to facilitate this please
Pavel Kovalenko created IGNITE-12297:
Summary: Detect lost partitions is not happened during cluster
activation
Key: IGNITE-12297
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12297
Project:
Then I would suggest to define good terminology at the very beginning of
the article.
Right in introduction section I see a lot of terms like "Binary object
format", "Binary object container format" (is it the same thing?), "Binary
serialization format". In the next section "binary type" pops up.
Hi Denis, Emmanouil
Thank you for your email. I think creating a separate integration project
in github and also proposing it as an apache incubator project will be a
good move. The other separate integration modules
Hope that we will be better prepared for new iteration.
чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 02:29, Denis Magda :
>
> Ivan,
>
> There is no argument here, I see what you mean. All we know is that Optane
> is a new class of a storage device that is slower than RAM but faster than
> disk. Plus, it's denser than
Ivan,
There is no argument here, I see what you mean. All we know is that Optane
is a new class of a storage device that is slower than RAM but faster than
disk. Plus, it's denser than RAM, and non-volatile that let us store
many-more terabytes of data on a single machine that can be accessed via
Sergey,
Thank you for a review!
> It seems to me that document tries to focus on details of the format itself
> but other aspects of this functionality leak into the explanation and
> confuses reader.
You are absolutely right, it was an original idea. I will try to
define a terminology and
16 matches
Mail list logo
