Pavel Konstantinov created IGNITE-1997:
--
Summary: "Query entities can be set only once." error on node start
Key: IGNITE-1997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1997
Project:
Hello all,
The initial OSGi integration is ready for review in branch ignite-1270.
Features included:
* OSGi manifest for most modules. I could OSGi-fy 22 modules. Some are left
out due to complexity or not supporting OSGi: hadoop, mesos, cloud, gce,
yarn, etc.
* Karaf features repository with 1
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> wrote:
>
> > At the risk of sounding pedantic, I think this link is best included as
> > part of some other OSGI documentation page (no?):
> >
HI Romain,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Romain Gilles
wrote:
> I have some comments for your pull request, one or two points. How does it
> works do you plan to create a pull request?
>
I personally don't create pull requests as I am a committer. The code is in
the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
> At the risk of sounding pedantic, I think this link is best included as
> part of some other OSGI documentation page (no?):
> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v1.5/docs/introduction
>
The page
Vladimir Ozerov created IGNITE-1998:
---
Summary: Platforms: create separate portable reader.
Key: IGNITE-1998
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1998
Project: Ignite
Issue
Hi Raul and Igniters,
I have some comments for your pull request, one or two points. How does it
works do you plan to create a pull request? How can I comment if no,
through the mailing list?
Does this branch is planed to be merge for the 1.5?
Thanks in advance.
Romain.
Le mar. 24 nov. 2015 à
GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/257
IGNITE-1985 .Net: Multithreaded tests fail
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ptupitsyn/ignite ignite-1985
Alternatively you
Github user ptupitsyn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/255
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ptupitsyn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/203
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/118
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/116
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/117
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Raul,
Thanks for taking on OSGI integration. I have reviewed the documentation
and it looks good.
At the risk of sounding pedantic, I think this link is best included as
part of some other OSGI documentation page (no?):
https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v1.5/docs/introduction
Hi Alexey
Have you tried to build Apache Ignite with suggested changes?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How about to update dependencies?
>
> scala to 2.11.7 and spark to 1.5.2
>
> Any objections?
>
> If no I will create issue and
Yes, I successfully build it locally,but not run tests on TC.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote:
> Hi Alexey
>
> Have you tried to build Apache Ignite with suggested changes?
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov <
>
+1 for adding support, particularly because in Scala we don't necessarily have
get... and set... (an underscore can be used for that).
Roman
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:39 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
Igniters,
I have such class in ignite-1.4
class Test(
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-1989:
Summary: Update scala to 2.11 and spark to 1.5.2
Key: IGNITE-1989
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1989
Project: Ignite
Issue Type:
Ok, I will fix trivial issues and prepare report for most suspicious code.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
> Alex, if you have already run this test, can you please share the report
> or, even more, fix vivid trivial issues right away and let us
GitHub user shroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/260
IGNITE-1800: Deleted MBeanServerResource annotation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shroman/ignite ignite-1800
Alternatively
Alexey Kuznetsov created IGNITE-1990:
Summary: Optimized marshaller failed with
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: java.math.BigDecimal in case of java
client
Key: IGNITE-1990
URL:
Hi!
How about to update dependencies?
scala to 2.11.7 and spark to 1.5.2
Any objections?
If no I will create issue and update.
--
Alexey Kuznetsov
GridGain Systems
www.gridgain.com
Thanks, Alex.
Could you tell at what branch you will add this?
Will you create an issue that I could track?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will add the check for non-get-named method if there are no objections, I
> see no reason for
GitHub user agura opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/261
ignite-1992 CacheStopAndDestroySelfTest.testLocalClose test fixed
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/agura/incubator-ignite
Vasilisa Sidorova created IGNITE-1991:
--
Summary: CacheClientBinaryPutGetExample fails with remote node,
started from command line
Key: IGNITE-1991
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1991
I will add the check for non-get-named method if there are no objections, I
see no reason for not having it.
2015-11-24 13:25 GMT+03:00 Roman Shtykh :
> +1 for adding support, particularly because in Scala we don't necessarily
> have get... and set... (an underscore
Vasilisa Sidorova created IGNITE-1994:
--
Summary: .Net: CrossPlatformExample looks unnecessary
Key: IGNITE-1994
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1994
Project: Ignite
Nigel Westbury created IGNITE-1993:
--
Summary: JDBC discovery uses non-standard SQL when creating table
(not compatible with Oracle)
Key: IGNITE-1993
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1993
29 matches
Mail list logo