Ilya, my congratulations!
вт, 6 авг. 2019 г. в 23:12, Dmitriy Pavlov :
>
> Ilya, congratulations!
>
> вт, 6 авг. 2019 г. в 22:58, Denis Magda :
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite
> > has invited Ilya Kasnacheev to become a committer and we are pleased
> > to announce
Ilya, congratulations!
вт, 6 авг. 2019 г. в 22:58, Denis Magda :
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite
> has invited Ilya Kasnacheev to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Ilya is one of the most active and valuable Ignite committers
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Ignite
has invited Ilya Kasnacheev to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Ilya is one of the most active and valuable Ignite committers who is not
only contributing source-code changes but also takes an active
Denis Chudov created IGNITE-12047:
-
Summary: senderNodeId is absent in StatusCheckMessage
Key: IGNITE-12047
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12047
Project: Ignite
Issue
Andrey Gura created IGNITE-12046:
Summary: [IEP-35] LongMetric interface contains redundant methods.
Key: IGNITE-12046
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12046
Project: Ignite
Andrey,
It seems that screenshot was rejected, I do not see it.
вт, 6 авг. 2019 г. в 15:07, Andrey Gura :
>
> Good example of proper buckets configuration. Such configuration is
> suitable for may cases. See attached screenshot (I hope it will not be
> reject by mail system or forum).
>
>
> On
Hello Igniters!
I made the test DoPrivelegedOnRemoteNodeTest[1] (SecurityTestSuite) for the
task "Sandbox for user-defined code" [2]
that uses p2p deploy like the test
ServiceHotRedeploymentViaDeploymentSpiTest [3] from
IgniteServiceGridTestSuite.
That test requires additional Maven command line
Good example of proper buckets configuration. Such configuration is
suitable for may cases. See attached screenshot (I hope it will not be
reject by mail system or forum).
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Andrey Gura wrote:
>
> > What do you mean by "exponential bounds"?
>
> Something like this
Alexey,
It seems that a problem has a solution with using 2 attributes or 2
labels. Is not it more clear than using custom code?
Folks,
> I don't think we should take "hard to implement" as an argument in this
> discussion :)
Did not fully get the point. KISS principle is not true anymore? Or
> What do you mean by "exponential bounds"?
Something like this if we talk about latency in ms for example: 5, 10,
25, 50, 100, 200, 500, ...
> Thanks, for the feedback, appreciate you ownesty.
Nothing personal. It is just about functionality from user's stand point.
> What is your proposal?
>
Pavel,
Just a real example you asked for: we have a user attribute "ROLE_DC",
which is a comma separated list like "wfe_a, as_a, db_a" (server role and
data center designator) and we have node filters to deploy services and
start caches on servers with specific role (like WFE) and sometimes
11 matches
Mail list logo
