Denis,
where should i make my PR to update documentation? To my understanding
there was a discussion whether to make PR into master or into a release
branch (at least release notes are merged into master) but the general
consensus wasn't reached.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:24 PM Yaroslav
Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-13870:
Summary: Remove GridCacheAdapter#validateCacheKey cause it seems
to be obsolete
Key: IGNITE-13870
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13870
Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-13869:
Summary: Add extra map query logging within the debug level.
Key: IGNITE-13869
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13869
Project: Ignite
Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-13868:
Summary: Create caches simultaneously in same non-existing cache
group led to NPE
Key: IGNITE-13868
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13868
Alexander Lapin created IGNITE-13867:
Summary: IgniteCacheTxExpiryPolicyTest.testNearAccess almost
stably fails in CE master
Key: IGNITE-13867
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13867
Vladislav Pyatkov created IGNITE-13866:
--
Summary: Validate index does not stop after process of control.sh
was interrupted
Key: IGNITE-13866
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13866
Hi Igniters,
I've detected some new issue on TeamCity to be handled. You are more than
welcomed to help.
*Test with high flaky rate in master-nightly
ResetLostPartitionTest.testReactivateGridBeforeResetLostPartitions
Will do.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 9:15 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> +1 (binding). Reverting my previous -1. We agreed that the release won't be
> announced and referenced from the website until the docs are ready.
>
> Yaroslav, could you please help to prepare the tickets and put together a
> draft?
+1 (binding). Reverting my previous -1. We agreed that the release won't be
announced and referenced from the website until the docs are ready.
Yaroslav, could you please help to prepare the tickets and put together a
draft? Nikita, thanks a lot for stepping up and agreeing to help with the
Hello everyone!
Yeah, guys, sorry, absolutely my mishap with docs.
Denis, of course, i will see to it that docs are ready first and foremost.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:30 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Ignite 2.9 docs were completed by the time we were running a vote for the
> last
Hi Maxim,
Ignite 2.9 docs were completed by the time we were running a vote for the
last release candidate. Once the vote passed, I released the docs through
the website. What happened next is an ongoing process of keeping the docs
actual - addressing users' feedback, merging generic changes to
Hi everyone,
Denis, yes, I'll review the new documentation.
Regards,
Nikita
ср, 16 дек. 2020 г. в 18:00, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Denis,
>
> I remember the agreement, but also we are always fixing documentation
> pages even after a release announced (like for 2.9.0 and the
> ignite-2.9 release
kgusakov commented on pull request #8:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/8#issuecomment-746534590
Merged
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
kgusakov closed pull request #8:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/8
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Folks, I'm a little bit concerned about the simultaneous
- existence of the repo https://github.com/apache/ignite-3 and PRs for that
repo
- and a couple of downvotes from PMC members.
Is it all fine here? Was there any vote /discussion where it was discussed
and consensus approved? What is the
Hi Varvara,
Thank you for your interest in Apache Ignite and welcome to the Apache
Ignite Community.
I've added a contributor role to the account, so now you should be able to
assign a ticket.
See also short intro how to contribute
Hello Ignite Community,
My name is Varvara and I'm a Big Data junior developer with 3 months
experience. My current knowledge includes Hadoop, Spark, Kafka, Hive.
I would like to take part in the Apache Ignite project and make a contribution
to it.
I'm thinking to start with some easy fix or
Denis,
I remember the agreement, but also we are always fixing documentation
pages even after a release announced (like for 2.9.0 and the
ignite-2.9 release branch). Can we go the same way here? For instance,
we can add all necessary documentation pages prior to the 2.9.1 wide
announce.
It
Yaroslav, thanks for checking,
- 1 (binding) - I have to cast this vote as long as the docs need to be
ready by the time of the vote.
Yaroslav, could you please help to prepare a draft with the documentation
updates? Nikita, would you mind reviewing the changes?
Denis
On Wednesday, December
Nikolay Izhikov created IGNITE-13865:
Summary: .Net: DateTime can't be used as a cache key or value
Key: IGNITE-13865
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13865
Project: Ignite
Hi, Valentin.
PR is ready for review, some smoke tests added.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:40 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> I've played with the tool a little bit and it looks great! I definitely
> like the overall approach of a single script
+1 (binding)
> 16 дек. 2020 г., в 13:13, Yaroslav Molochkov
> написал(а):
>
> Denis, actually, i'm mistaken, totally forgot about these:
> * Added System view for binary metadata
> * Added System view for metastorage items
> * Added RebalancingPartitionsTotal metrics
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020
Vladislav Pyatkov created IGNITE-13864:
--
Summary: Assertion error happens on stale latch's acknowledge
Key: IGNITE-13864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13864
Project: Ignite
Denis, actually, i'm mistaken, totally forgot about these:
* Added System view for binary metadata
* Added System view for metastorage items
* Added RebalancingPartitionsTotal metrics
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 1:03 PM Yaroslav Molochkov
wrote:
> Denis, hello!
>
> Since it's a minor bug-fixing
Denis, hello!
Since it's a minor bug-fixing release the update is not needed
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:38 PM Denis Magda wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
>
> Do we need to update documentation?
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:34 PM Yaroslav Molochkov >
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
>
Igor Sapego created IGNITE-13863:
Summary: Python thin client hangs when object has Boolean field
Key: IGNITE-13863
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13863
Project: Ignite
Archita Sukhwani created IGNITE-13862:
-
Summary: Python Thin Client: put_all operation on a huge
dictionary (say 1 keys) results in connection timeout, same happens with
multiple consecutive put operations using a for loop unless a sleep
27 matches
Mail list logo
