Re: 1.5.final

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > Hi > > Last issue has been fixed and we started to prepare the release > Apache Ignite 1.5 > Great news! Thanks, everyone, for the effort put in. Looking forward to the final release. > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at

Re: 1.5.final

Hi Last issue has been fixed and we started to prepare the release Apache Ignite 1.5 On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > Yes, sure. > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan > wrote: > >> If the examples work well

Re: 1.5.final

Yes, sure. On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > If the examples work well with BinaryMarshaller, I think we can push this > ticket to 1.6. Thoughts? > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sergey Kozlov > wrote: > > > It is the

Re: 1.5.final

If the examples work well with BinaryMarshaller, I think we can push this ticket to 1.6. Thoughts? On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sergey Kozlov wrote: > It is the way to test optimized marshaller. > The binary marshaller is a new feature and not very well tested yet thus

Re: 1.5.final

IGNITE-2252 Add support for cache sql schema in REST topology command Fixed, tested, docs updated and merged into release branch. -- Alexey Kuznetsov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com

Re: 1.5.final

Hi It's the last ticket from the list provided yesterday. But today we found yet another blocker issue and now we're working on it: IGNITE-2257 Incorrect deserialization of BinaryContext. On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov

Re: 1.5.final

Igniters, Another issue has been reported related to unexpected exception in examples when optimized marshaller is used: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2266 I will try to fix this before 2257 is fixed to fit in 1.5, however I do not think it is a blocker for the release.

Re: 1.5.final

The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2200 has been merged to ignite-1.5​

Re: 1.5.final

Hi Igniters We've great progress and only two outstanding issues prevents to release: IGNITE-2252 Add support for cache sql schema in REST topology command IGNITE-2175 Not valid exceptions in case when example can't works with remote node started

Re: 1.5.final

Got it. Looks like this is the only remaining issue. Please let us know here once you fix it, so we could start voting on the final release. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > No, this is not old issue, new cache configuration property "SQL

Re: 1.5.final

The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2175 has been merged to ignite-1.5​ On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > I think "IGNITE-2252 Add support for cache sql schema in REST topology > command" will be fixed tomorrow in first half

Re: 1.5.final

No, this is not old issue, new cache configuration property "SQL schema" was merged into ignite-1.5 two days ago. I would like to fix in ignite-1.5 in order to be able to execute SQL queries from Ignite console against ignite-1.5 cluster. New "SQL schema" cache configuration property

Re: 1.5.final

As of today, there are still 4 tickets open: http://s.apache.org/ignite-1.5.0.final Anton - 2 tickets Vladimir - 1 ticket Alexey - 1 ticket D. On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like it is a duplicate of IGNITE-2135. > The issue is

Re: 1.5.final

I closed my ticket. There was a problem in test preventing compilation with Java 8. On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > As of today, there are still 4 tickets open: > http://s.apache.org/ignite-1.5.0.final > > Anton - 2 tickets > Vladimir - 1

Re: 1.5.final

answer. > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > From maven standpoint, 1.5.0.final comes after 1.5.0-b1. Can someone > double > > confirm this? > > > > D. > > > > On Mon, Dec

Re: 1.5.final

che.org> > wrote: > > > 1.5.final is bigger that 1.5.0-b1? Or lesser? > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:33AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the 1.5 > final > > > release. Can everyone in

Re: 1.5.final

​Sure, I will provide my feedback in a couple of hours.

Re: 1.5.final

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > IGNITE-2116 ignite-osgi-karaf has only readme and license files > Waiting for Raul's answer. > Replied in the ticket. Sorry for the delay. Too many open fronts! *Raúl Kripalani* PMC & Committer @ Apache

Re: 1.5.final

Looks like it is a duplicate of IGNITE-2135. The issue is caused by not setting deployment info bean in query request when binary marshaller is used. I anticipate the fix to be pretty simple, though need some more time to add a proper test and to run CI. Will send an update once all is done.

Re: 1.5.final

I closed one, Left: IGNITE-2175 Not valid exceptions in case when example can't works with remote node started with server classpath (Java 7) On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > I closed my ticket. There was a problem in test preventing compilation

Re: 1.5.final

at the fix version for this ticket is 1.6. Can somebody confirm > > that it is not critical for the release? > > On Dec 21, 2015 19:34, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the 1.5 > final > > > release. Can everyone in the community please reply here with a list of > > > tickets you are still working on for 1.5 release? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > D. > > > > > >

Re: 1.5.final

cache value. There is no a simple fix for this, > > however > > > I see that the fix version for this ticket is 1.6. Can somebody confirm > > > that it is not critical for the release? > > > On Dec 21, 2015 19:34, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the 1.5 > > final > > > > release. Can everyone in the community please reply here with a list > of > > > > tickets you are still working on for 1.5 release? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > >

Re: 1.5.final

Added test, fixed and merged to > > > > igntie-1.5 > > > > > > > > The only issue that I had not time to take a look at is > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2212- tx put triggers > > > > multiple > > > > deserializations of

Re: 1.5.final

e >> > > > release >> > > > >> > > > IGNITE-2190 - Reported by Denis. Added test, fixed and merged to >> > > > igntie-1.5 >> > > > >> > > > The only issue that I had not time to take a look at is >>

Re: 1.5.final

> handled in TXT queries. This is an old issue and it is not critical > > for > > > > the > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > IGNITE-2190 - Reported by Denis. Added test, fixed and merged to > > > > > igntie-1.

Re: 1.5.final

1.5.final is bigger that 1.5.0-b1? Or lesser? On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:33AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the 1.5 final > release. Can everyone in the community please reply here with a list of > tickets you are still working o

Re: 1.5.final

>From maven standpoint, 1.5.0.final comes after 1.5.0-b1. Can someone double confirm this? D. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > 1.5.final is bigger that 1.5.0-b1? Or lesser? > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:33AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan

1.5.final

I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the 1.5 final release. Can everyone in the community please reply here with a list of tickets you are still working on for 1.5 release? Thanks, D.

Re: 1.5.final

. There is no a simple fix for this, however I see that the fix version for this ticket is 1.6. Can somebody confirm that it is not critical for the release? On Dec 21, 2015 19:34, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining issues for the

Re: 1.5.final

fix for this, however > I see that the fix version for this ticket is 1.6. Can somebody confirm > that it is not critical for the release? > On Dec 21, 2015 19:34, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I would like to assemble a list of the remaining