Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

2016-03-02 Thread bintisepaha
Thank you Val, this is very helpful. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Deprecate-IgniteConfiguration-getGridName-tp2420p7685.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

2016-02-26 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
Binti, This is not an issue. What is discussed here is just proper naming of this configuration property, but the concept stays the same - this is the name of local Ignite instance and there is no requirement for all nodes in topology to share the same name. Whether nodes discover each other or

Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

2016-02-26 Thread bintisepaha
Hi, We are facing this issue, nodes with different grid names are being identified in a single topology. Did the fix for this make it into version 1.6? If yes, how can I get this version? Thanks, Binti -- View this message in context:

Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

2015-08-26 Thread Semyon Boikov
We can add 'nodeName' on ClusterNode API, it is very easy to implement since node name is already stored in node attributes. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan dsetrak...@apache.org wrote: Although I share the sentiment that gridName is confusing, I think renaming gridName to

Re: Deprecate IgniteConfiguration.getGridName

2015-08-26 Thread Valentin Kulichenko
+1 for 'instanceName'. 'nodeName' looks confusing as well - I would think that it should be unique among all nodes. -Val On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Raul Kripalani r...@evosent.com wrote: Agree. The term grid to refer to a single node is very confusing. On 19 Aug 2015 08:58, Semyon