Re:Re: An easier way to create time series.

Maybe starting from a sugar, we can add some improvements gradually. Currently, I think making timeseries creation easier should be enough. Please share if you have some fancy ideas that can go with the introduction of "device". Tian Jiang At 2019-08-14 10:44:14, "Xiangdong Huang" wrote:

Re: An easier way to create time series.

Hi, Looks fine for me. One question, is it just a language syntax sugar, or we can as well as improve the schema management? Any idea? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Tian Jiang 于2019年8月14日周三 上午10:37写道： >

Re:Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-163) Support create device template and create device.

I am glad that you like this idea, I have created another thread to discuss the issue as I find people seldom discuss in the thread created by Jira-bot.By the way, renaming all the nouns you have mentioned is cool, but it takes extra time to refactor and adapt.Tian Jiang 在 2019-08-14

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-163) Support create device template and create device.

Hi Tian, I like this abstraction. I support to expose some interfaces for users to manipulate the "device". Further, maybe we could introduce the "database", "table", "column" concepts in IoTDB. Best, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -原始邮件- >

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-163) Support create device template and create device.

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-163: Summary: Support create device template and create device. Key: IOTDB-163 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-163 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-162) Fix the semantics of hasNext() and next().

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-162: Summary: Fix the semantics of hasNext() and next(). Key: IOTDB-162 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-162 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type:

[LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.8.0, which is the first Apache Release for the IoTDB Project. The Apache IoTDB community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.8.0. We now kindly request the

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, as announced the vote closes now. The vote PASSES as we have 6 +1 votes from the PPMC, 4 +1 votes from IPMC members and no further 0 or -1 votes. I will now bring the vote to gene...@incubator.apache.org to get approval by the IPMC. If this Vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

+1 binding. I checked: Checked incubating in the artifacts name Checked License and Notice file of source zip and bin zip Build source file with mvn clean install. There is no binary files in the source jar. Here are some issue I found. 1. There are jenkins file which need to be excluded from

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE file - NOTICE has a minor issue - signatures and hashes fine - al source file have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files - can compile from source Re NOTICE there no need to list this line twice: "This product

Re:Re:Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Checked Items: 1. Download the binary release and decompress it. 2. Run the server and the client in the binary release and execute several commands. 3. Restart the db in the binary release. 4. Download the source release and decompress it. 5. Build the source and run all tests. 6.

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Agreed, thats the best way how NOT to do it :D Am 13.08.19, 10:15 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, Either is fine. The only thing is that I want to get rid of checking the error message content Best, ---

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Hi, Either is fine. The only thing is that I want to get rid of checking the error message content Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer 于2019年8月13日周二 下午4:12写道： > Hi all, > > what one could also

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Hi all, what one could also use is some "ResponseEnum" which could be hosted in an error code, perhaps? But, generally I agree with Tian. Julian Am 13.08.19, 10:07 schrieb "江天" : Well, I prefer to define new Exception classes over ugly error codes, which better utilize OOP.

Re: consider introduce error code in client-side

Well, I prefer to define new Exception classes over ugly error codes, which better utilize OOP. Tian Jiang > 在 2019年8月13日，下午4:00，Xiangdong Huang 写道： > > Hi, > > When using IoTDB-JDBC to operate data, I realize that it is not convenient > without error codes > > The typical

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Thank you Willem, looking forward for your Vote : ) Am 13.08.19, 10:05 schrieb "Willem Jiang" : Hi Julian, Thanks for taking care of this. I will take a look at the release kit later today. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi Julian, Thanks for taking care of this. I will take a look at the release kit later today. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 3:55 PM Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-161) ERROR code is needed.

Well, I prefer to define new Exception classes over ugly error codes, which better utilize OOP. Tian Jiang > 在 2019年8月13日，下午3:45，xiangdong Huang (JIRA) 写道： > > xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-161: > - > > Summary: ERROR code is needed. >

consider introduce error code in client-side

Hi, When using IoTDB-JDBC to operate data, I realize that it is not convenient without error codes The typical application is register a new time series automatically if the received data belongs to a not existed time series.. Now, I have to check the error message to judge whether the

[REMINDER][VOTE] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hi all, this is a short reminder for everybody in the iotdb community that we have a vote ongoing for our first Apache Release 0.8.0. This goes especially to all PPMCs. Please take on your duty and participate in the vote! We currently only have only 3 +1 PPMC votes. I would like to close the

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-161) ERROR code is needed.

xiangdong Huang created IOTDB-161: - Summary: ERROR code is needed. Key: IOTDB-161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-161 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Task