[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [250]'

BUILD-STABLE: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [250]': Is back to normal.

JIRA issues comments can be forwarded to dev mailing list now

Hi all, As there are more and more users/developers open issues on jira, and sometimes we do not know where to answer the issue (on mailing list or jira, or both), I open a ticket to apply forwarding comments on jira to dev mailing list automatically [1]. Before this, only JIRA created and

Re: [DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

+1. Look forward to the new release version. --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 jincheng sun 于2019年12月28日周六 上午7:30写道： > I think 2020 would be fine ：） > > Christofer Dutz 于2019年12月28日 周六00:45写道： > > > +1 From me too > > >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-339) Optimize QueryPlan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-339. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Optimize QueryPlan > -- > >

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-339) Optimize QueryPlan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17004379#comment-17004379 ] Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-339: --- [https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/677] > Optimize

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-340) Remove unnecessary getting data types from MManager when querying

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-340. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Remove unnecessary getting data types from

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-394) How to query the latest data point

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17004377#comment-17004377 ] Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-394: --- Hi, currently you could use aggregations to get the results. For

Re: [DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

I think 2020 would be fine ：） Christofer Dutz 于2019年12月28日 周六00:45写道： > +1 From me too > > Chris > > Am 27.12.19, 17:40 schrieb "Kevin A. McGrail" : > > +1 to update in advance just make sure not to announce the release > until > 2020. > > On 12/27/2019 10:32 AM, Lei Rui wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

+1 From me too Chris Am 27.12.19, 17:40 schrieb "Kevin A. McGrail" : +1 to update in advance just make sure not to announce the release until 2020. On 12/27/2019 10:32 AM, Lei Rui wrote: > Hi, > > > I am the release manager of the upcoming 0.9.1 and I encounter

Re: [DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

+1 to update in advance just make sure not to announce the release until 2020. On 12/27/2019 10:32 AM, Lei Rui wrote: > Hi, > > > I am the release manager of the upcoming 0.9.1 and I encounter an interesting > question: > > > As you can see, Year 2020 is just around the corner and the upcoming

[DISCUSS] Should I change the year to 2020 in advance when releasing 0.9.1?

Hi, I am the release manager of the upcoming 0.9.1 and I encounter an interesting question: As you can see, Year 2020 is just around the corner and the upcoming release vote for 0.9.1 is likely to span from 2019 to 2020. So I don't know if I should change the year in advance to 2020, or

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-394) How to query the latest data point

chenzhengwei created IOTDB-394: -- Summary: How to query the latest data point Key: IOTDB-394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-394 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Wish

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [249]'

BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [249]': Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/IoTDB-Pipeline/job/master/249/;>IoTDB-Pipeline/master [master] [249]"