[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17012528#comment-17012528
]
Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-405:
---
Caching all printed results is feasible, as the performance of the
Hi Zhu, added.
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Boris Zhu 于2020年1月10日周五 下午12:59写道：
> Hi,
> My Jira id is geniuspig, please give me committer permission in jira.
>
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 1:04 PM Xiangdong Huang
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17012456#comment-17012456
]
Boris Zhu commented on IOTDB-405:
-
this is because we don’t know the length of time-series, we get results
Hi,
My Jira id is geniuspig, please give me committer permission in jira.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 1:04 PM Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> Hi all committers,
>
> Thanks @jincheng sun from Flink community, I find the position to maintain
> users role on jira...
>
> Now the project Lead is Justin and
Tian Jiang created IOTDB-412:
Summary: Paths are not correctly deduplicated
Key: IOTDB-412
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-412
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type: Bug
Hi,
It a requirement for the PPMC to be signed up to the private mailing list.
So far these PPMC members are currently not subscribed*:
Gaofei Cao
Jinrui Zhang
Julian Feinauer
Kun Liu
Rong Kang
Shuo Zhang
Stefanie Zhao
We also have a large
Hu Jincheng,
the information should be available here:
https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-reproducible-builds.html
However I would suggest to add another configuration to the build:
apache-release
com.theoryinpractise
Thank you Julian.
Regards,
Lei Rui
On 1/9/2020 18:30，Xiangdong Huang wrote：
Hi Julian,
Welcome back~.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Julian Feinauer 于2020年1月9日周四 下午6:28写道：
Hi,
sorry for being late to the
Hi,
Sure, maybe a bit more...
- TsFile : A columnar file format that has flexible schema and data
management for time series.
- Storage : The storage engine of IoTDB, including writing to memtable
(buffer), flushing, system recovery, and memtable management.
- Query : The query process in
Hi Julian,
Welcome back~.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Julian Feinauer 于2020年1月9日周四 下午6:28写道：
> Hi,
>
> sorry for being late to the Party...
>
> My vote is +1 (binding, IPMC Vote)
>
> I did:
> - check out
Hi,
sorry for being late to the Party...
My vote is +1 (binding, IPMC Vote)
I did:
- check out from svn
- Check README, RELEASE_NOTES
- Check Signatures, Hashes and Keys file (first release of Lei Rui)
- Run "mvn clean install" on source release
Minor Issue: With German Locale it does NOT
+1 to upgrade the version.
BTW: add the link [1] which more detail about `Reproducible Builds` that
Chris mentioned.
Best,
Jincheng
[1] http://maven.apache.org/pom/asf/
Christofer Dutz 于2020年1月9日周四 下午4:50写道：
> Hi all,
>
> the maven team just released version 22 of the apache parent.
> I
sunjincheng created IOTDB-411:
-
Summary: Update the apache parent pom to version 22
Key: IOTDB-411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-411
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17011615#comment-17011615
]
sunjincheng commented on IOTDB-409:
---
Agree with you [~qiaojialin]. I think the relative path used in the
Hi,
@Xiangdong thank you for helping to clarify my original intention. you are
right, I really want to list some components to let users choose which
component the given issue belongs to.
@Jialin I think approach 4 would be more meaningful for IoTDB. Could you
please add the detailed description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17011578#comment-17011578
]
Jialin Qiao commented on IOTDB-409:
---
Hi, I suggest avoiding using the IOTDB_HOME in documents.
>
Hi all,
the maven team just released version 22 of the apache parent.
I would strongly suggest you update to this version. Not only because Apache in
general likes projects to release using the latest apache parent.
The main reason I think this is great is that with this you should
> No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area
I think Jincheng's mean is, we can list some components to let users
choose which component the given issue belongs to.
As for which components should be listed, we need to have a discussion.
> No one should be in charge of
> No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area.
Oh, great thanks for correcting me Justin, maybe it's my language
expression problems. I mean some contributors and committers will be very
interested in some components, then spend more time, and be more familiar
with the
Hi,
Attaching a component of each issue will help contributors quickly locate
the problem.
This has nothing to do with specifying someone in a certain area, it just a
classification of issues :)
I would like to give an approach 4
- TsFile (module: tsfile)
- Storage (StorageEngine in server
Hi,
> When our community grows stronger, each\ module may have some specific person
> in charge.
No that is not the Apache Way. No one should be in charge of an area.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi folks,
Currently we can not select one components when create a JIRA. [1]. At
present, this problem is not obvious because there are not many
contributors of IoTDB, and the active committers need to have a certain
understanding of each module. When our community grows stronger, each
module may
22 matches
Mail list logo
