[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-533) tag 'latest' for IoTDB image in docker hub

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048837#comment-17048837 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-533: --- Hi [~LinYiming] many thanks. I have added the latest tag.

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-533) tag 'latest' for IoTDB image in docker hub

林以明 created IOTDB-533: - Summary: tag 'latest' for IoTDB image in docker hub Key: IOTDB-533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-533 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-532) [Distributed] Enabling parallel processing within a data group

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-532: Summary: [Distributed] Enabling parallel processing within a data group Key: IOTDB-532 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-532 Project: Apache IoTDB

Re: Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - March 2020

Hi, I have written a draft for this report. If there are no suggestions, I will paste the content to the wiki tonight. # IoTDB IoTDB is a data store for managing large amounts of time series data such as timestamped data from IoT sensors in industrial applications. IoTDB has been incubating

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048669#comment-17048669 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --- [~hxd]I did a very first and very simple implementation. In

Podling Iotdb Report Reminder - March 2020

Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 March 2020, 10:30 am PDT. The report for your podling will form

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-530) GROUP BY does not allow timezone information in 2nd Parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048607#comment-17048607 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-530: --- Hi,  select avg(counter), count(counter) from

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048606#comment-17048606 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --- Yes, indeed I know. I already scratched one for grafana

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048605#comment-17048605 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-528: --- That could not be better! Notice that we have docker

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048604#comment-17048604 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --- Hey [~hxd] no need to hurry. I will implement it myself

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048603#comment-17048603 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-528: --- OK, if we let users assign how many data points they can

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048602#comment-17048602 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --- Exactly, this is what I meant. E.g. we could say we limit

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048599#comment-17048599 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-528: --- Hi julian, you mean that suppose we have a parameter called 

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-530) GROUP BY does not allow timezone information in 2nd Parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048594#comment-17048594 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-530: --- Hm, I read the source code on the master. The group by

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048590#comment-17048590 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-531: --- yes, it should throw meaningful exception. > iotdb-grafana

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048589#comment-17048589 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-531: --- Yes, indeed. But the parser does not fail but silently

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048586#comment-17048586 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-531: --- Hi the URL prefix should be, "jdbc:iotdb://", you write it

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048584#comment-17048584 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-531: --- Oh, sry for the confusion. That was not the issue. The

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048582#comment-17048582 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-531: --- [~hxd] I found the issue. It seems like Utils:43 which is

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048579#comment-17048579 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-531: --- Hi, which version you are using? 0.9.1? > iotdb-grafana

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048580#comment-17048580 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --- Hey [~hxd] , my simple idea was to have a fixed rule which

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048578#comment-17048578 ] Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-531: --- This seems to be an issue related to the Parsing in the

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-531) iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host

Julian Feinauer created IOTDB-531: - Summary: iotdb-grafana does not take domain as host Key: IOTDB-531 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-531 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048574#comment-17048574 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-528: --- Hi,   It seems SimpleJSON does not support aggregation

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

Hi, It seems SimpleJSON does not support aggregation push-down[1]. Actually, we need a better Grafana connector implementation to solve this problem. [1] https://grafana.com/grafana/plugins/grafana-simple-json-datasource Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-530) GROUP BY does not allow timezone information in 2nd Parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048569#comment-17048569 ] Xiangdong Huang commented on IOTDB-530: --- Hi [~geniuspig] and [~qiaojialin], can you fix this

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-530) GROUP BY does not allow timezone information in 2nd Parameter

Julian Feinauer created IOTDB-530: - Summary: GROUP BY does not allow timezone information in 2nd Parameter Key: IOTDB-530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-530 Project: Apache IoTDB

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-376) Metric module is not enabled when calling executeQueryStatement()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17048564#comment-17048564 ] Yuxin Zhang commented on IOTDB-376: --- hi, I've finished this issue in PR

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-529) Relative times and NOW() operator cannot be used in Group By

Julian Feinauer created IOTDB-529: - Summary: Relative times and NOW() operator cannot be used in Group By Key: IOTDB-529 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-529 Project: Apache IoTDB

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-528) [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire

Julian Feinauer created IOTDB-528: - Summary: [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire Key: IOTDB-528 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528 Project: