Re: Introducing a memory control mechanism during the query planning stage #12573

2024-05-22 Thread William Song
Hi Lanyu, Bravo work! Learned a lot from your PR. Best Ziyang > 2024年5月23日 11:08,Liao Lanyu <1435078...@qq.com.INVALID> 写道: > > Hi, > Currently, the IoTDB query engine does not implement memory control at the FE > (Frontend) stage. In scenarios with massive series queries (e.g., select * >

[DISCUSS] Enable auto balance for schemaregion

2024-01-02 Thread William Song
Hi Dev Team, I'm writing to discuss the auto balancing feature in IoTDB, which currently is operational for data region. This feature is designed to optimize resource use, maximize throughput, minimize response time, and prevent overloading on any individual resource. However, it's presently

Celebrating the Release of Ratis 3.0.0 on Our Community's Contributions

2023-12-26 Thread William Song
Dear Community Members, I am excited to announce the release of Ratis version 3.0.0, marking the first major version update since IoTDB began utilizing Ratis for consensus services. This release encompasses a multitude of new features, enhancements, and fixes, all of which are the

Re: Ratis SNAPSHOT versions in our latest release ...

2023-09-13 Thread William Song
Hi Chris, Thanks very much for pointing out this problem! > So it’s still not ideal, as the referenced artifacts will never go to Maven > Central and could cause problems with the one or the other user I agree it’s not ideal. We’ll drive the Ratis Community to release an official version

Re: Fixing flaky tests?

2023-08-06 Thread William Song
s/runs/5764037692/job/15640048487?pr=10789). > You may want to investigate the cause of this issue. > > Thanks > -- > Xinyu Tan > > On 2023/08/04 14:59:51 William Song wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> I will take a look at RatisConsensusTest. I

Re: Fixing flaky tests?

2023-08-04 Thread William Song
Hi Chris, I will take a look at RatisConsensusTest. In case the tests fail next time, feel free to mention me directly in the PR. This way, I can view the complete error stack. William > 2023年8月4日 17:13,Christofer Dutz 写道: > > Hi all, > > So, in the past days I‘ve been building IoTDB on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enhance Read Consistency Level During Restart in RatisConsensus

2023-07-19 Thread William Song
TDB, but at least this > would be my expectation on a user-level. > > I’m currently reviewing our “competitor” solutions and inconsistencies were > what made me dislike the one or the other solution instantly. Trust lost > easily, and hard to regain. > > Chris > >

[PROPOSAL] Enhance Read Consistency Level During Restart in RatisConsensus

2023-07-18 Thread William Song
iated. Regards William Song

Re: [VOTE] Apache IoTDB 1.0.0 RC5 release

2022-12-04 Thread William Song
+1 (non-binding) * Verified git hash and checksum * Built IoTDB locally from source * Ran IoTDB tests locally Best Regards, Song Ziyang

Re: Chaneg the name of StandAloneConsensus

2022-10-31 Thread William Song
Since there’s one replica and do not involve any consensus process, how about we remove the ‘Consensus’ suffix and call it ‘SingleReplica’? Regards, Song > 2022年10月31日 12:39,Yuan Tian 写道: > > Hi, all > > Now, we name the consensus which is optmized for only single > replica(actualy this