Hi,
Let's keep this thread for discussion...
> I agree that this information can show the diversity
> directly, and considering people contribute as individuals, I prefer
reduce
> the maintenance costs.
Considering the benefit that the info can show the diversity (and it is
beneficial for
Thanks for your kindly help!
I will try to propose a VOTE, and introduce the method about how to maintain
personal information in the website repository : )
Best,
---
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University
孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院
> 2019年12月16日
Hi all,
Sounds pretty good, thank you for pushing forward this work Zesong!
I want to know that do we need to make a VOTE thread to make the final
decision about the change of this discussion?(I didn't find the relevant
documents.)
Of course, this change is very small, and we can also avoid
Hi,
I like this idea very much and would like to update our committer page like
gobblin[1] does.
I’d like to open an “example” PR later as a model in the website repository
[2], so that every committer and contributor can maintain their own information
by opening PR themselves.
What do you
Hi Xiangdong,
Thank you for your confirmation of the proposal!
Yes, regarding the `Organization` information, compared with `Apache ID`
and `Name`, the update frequency of `Organization` will be higher, which
will bring some maintenance costs to committer.
You are right, I agree that this
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion.
> So, I proposal that enrich information of project committers as follows
I like the idea. More detailed info may encourage the committers (Give the
committers more chance to show themselves).
> But I don't know why this information was originally added, maybe
Hi Justin，
Thank you for your explanation，It makes more sense to me .
+1 for remove the Organization information.
Best，
Jincheng
Justin Mclean 于2019年12月16日 周一19:55写道：
> Hi,
>
> > But I don't know why this information was originally added, maybe
> > @Xiangdong know more about this. :)
>
>
Hi,
> But I don't know why this information was originally added, maybe
> @Xiangdong know more about this. :)
It can be for a number of reasons, some projects which were started by one
company may want to show how diverse they have become and highlight that. In
some cases some popular projects
Hi Justin,
Personally, for a open source project the `Organization` info is not
necessary.
But I don't know why this information was originally added, maybe
@Xiangdong know more about this. :)
Best,
Jincheng
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121
Justin Mclean 于2019年12月16日周一 下午4:56写道：
HI,
> - Organization - The organization(school, company)
People contribute as individuals not who they work for so it may be best to
leave that information out, even if some projects put it in.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi folks,
We can find the committers of IoTDB in the page [1]. Currently, there are
two columns in the infomation table:
- Name - Full name of a Committer
- Organization - The organization(school, company, ?)
There are some of incubator project supported same info as IoTDB, such as
[2], and
11 matches
Mail list logo
