cture soon.
>
> Best regards,
> Tsung-Han Tsai
>
> 寄件者: 李天安
> 寄件日期: 2019年7月19日 下午 02:52
> 收件者: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> 主旨: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hi，
> I prefer structure 4 to other structures.
> + 1 for that.
>
&
: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
Hi，
I prefer structure 4 to other structures.
+ 1 for that.
Best Regards,
—
Tianan Li
School of Software, Tsinghua University
李天安
清华大学 软件学院
> 在 2019年7月19日，下午2:30，Jialin Qiao 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> Nothing good comes easily :)
>
&g
--
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>> -原始邮件-
>> 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang"
>> 发送时间: 2019-07-18 20:13:52 (星期四)
>> 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
>> 抄送:
>> 主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
&
he community adopts more and more to the apache
> way. Good job everyone!
>
> Julian
>
> Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
> Von: Jialin Qiao
> An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
&g
t; 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang"
> 发送时间: 2019-07-18 20:13:52 (星期四)
> 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hi all,
>
> So we have made a consensus :).
>
> Best,
> ---
> Xiangdong Huang
> Schoo
0:13:52 (星期四)
> 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hi all,
>
> So we have made a consensus :).
>
> Best,
> ---
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大
-client.bat".
> >
> > Best
> > --
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> > > -原始邮件-
> > > 发件人: "
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> > -----原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "RUI, LEI" <1010953...@qq.com>
> > 发送时间: 2019-07-18 11:24:50 (星期四)
> > 收件人: dev
> >
s, it's better to combine "run-client.bat" with "start-client.bat".
Best
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "RUI, LEI" <1010953...@qq.com>
> 发送时间: 2019-07-18 11:24:50 (星期四)
> 收件人: dev
-SNAPSHOT.war
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "Justin Mclean";
发送时间: 2019年7月18日(星期四) 上午10:38
收件人: "dev";
主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
Hi,
There should be no need to vote on something like this try to reach
consensus by discussion.
Thanks.
Justin
On Thu
Hi,
I prefer the second. I will feel frustrated when I open the bin folder only to
find everything is crowded in it. With the names of the scripts largely alike,
searching for a specific one may take more time. And I really don't think some
duplicated library matters. We are in 2010s, tens of
Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> > -原始邮件-
> > 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang"
> > 发送时间: 2019-07-17 14:18:10 (星期三)
> > 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> > 抄送:
> > 主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> &g
清华大学 软件学院
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Xiangdong Huang"
> 发送时间: 2019-07-17 14:18:10 (星期三)
> 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hi,
>
> Though I also think the second structure is more clear, many databases
> projects use
advise not to use them and with the assembly
> plugin, the
> > binary stuff gets packaged alongside the source bundle during the
> release
> > build.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Holen Sie sichOutlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei
Sie sichOutlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
>
> From: Julian Feinauer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:39:51 PM
> To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> Subject: AW: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hey Chris
für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
>
> From: Xiangdong Huang
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:57:52 PM
> To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the structure of the binaries can be:
>
o: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
Hi,
I think the structure of the binaries can be:
(Structure 1):
.
├── LICENSE
├── NOTICE
├── bin
│ ├── export-csv.bat
│ ├── export-csv.sh
│ ├── import-csv.bat
│ ├── import-csv.sh
│ ├── run-client.bat
│ ├── start-WalChecker.bat
│ ├──
id<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
>
> From: Julian Feinauer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:39:51 PM
> To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
> Subject: AW: Binary Release of IoTDB
>
> Hey Chris,
>
> I also thought about that and... Contacting you :P
> But I though
No objections Chris, if you give some help we will manage it and I agree that's
the technically superior solution.
J
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
Von: Christofer Dutz
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Cc:
Bash scripts
Julian Feinauer
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:39:51 PM
To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Subject: AW: Binary Release of IoTDB
Hey Chris,
I also thought about that and... Contacting you :P
But I thought about a bash script :)
Julian
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nac
Hey Chris,
I also thought about that and... Contacting you :P
But I thought about a bash script :)
Julian
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
Von: Christofer Dutz
An: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Cc:
We could whip up a maven
12:30:21 PM
To: dev@iotdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binary Release of IoTDB
+1 to a binary release along side a source release as a convenience.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 05:40 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache releases source code not binaries, but you make can also release a
> conve
+1 to a binary release along side a source release as a convenience.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019, 05:40 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache releases source code not binaries, but you make can also release a
> convenance binary along side a source release as noted in the link Julian
> provided. Note
Hi,
Apache releases source code not binaries, but you make can also release a
convenance binary along side a source release as noted in the link Julian
provided. Note that the LICENSE and NOTICE requirements may be diffract as a
binary contents may differ.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
+1.
Binary package is useful to attack users.. Out of the box should be a
target of IoTDB.
As IoTDB has some modules, like Hadoop adaptor, Spark adaptor, and
Grafana-IoTDB connector, I think we also need to discuss whether do we need
to include them all in the binary version.
For my
Hi all,
when thinking about the release process I also thought about whether we should
provide only source (as is the theory of the ASF) or if we should also provide
binary packages.
I think the latter is better to make it easier for users to download and run
the server.
I checked the
26 matches
Mail list logo
