m/apache/iotdb/tree/master/client-py
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Shi Jinghai"
> 发送时间: 2020-11-09 13:29:42 (星期一)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
&
://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/client-py
Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
-原始邮件-
发件人: "Shi Jinghai"
发送时间: 2020-11-09 13:29:42 (星期一)
收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
抄送:
主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoi
he.org<mailto:dev@iotdb.apache.org>
主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hi,
I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well.
+1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI?
Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University
乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院
-原始邮件-
收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
抄送:
主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint
Hey,
yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just
a very small handler.
Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module.
I dislike the idea of having spring i
Hey,
yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a
very small handler.
Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module.
I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well.
Julian
Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" :
Hi,
Hi,
> what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector
directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default).
it is ok.
But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large
now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module)
Best,
Hi folks,
as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an option
to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server Context
(could be disbaled by default).
This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB Data.
WDYT?
Julian
