[jira] Commented: (JCR-2591) Prevent single-valued property with no value after RTE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855868#action_12855868 ] Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-2591: Do we have cases where this is needed? AFAIUI none

Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Hi We're running a multi-threaded application which creates/updates nodes in jackrabbit. Here's an outline of the deployment model:- - The jackrabbit web app is deployed to the same tomcat instance as our main app. - The jackrabbit repository is accessed from our app using RMI. - We use

Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Hi, - The jackrabbit repository is accessed from our app using RMI. Can you use the repository in embedded mode? That would help a lot. embedded Derby database We've tested using postgres I would test the H2 database if you have time. Regards, Thomas

Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

George If you read the documentation you will see RMI is not the recommended mode of access. Foo whole EJB saga had so much stories about RMI horrors or whatever. Best is to use Jackrabbit in embeded mode and expose Remoting layer like Rest, etc. On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:05 PM,

[jira] Commented: (OCM-43) Reviving OCM framework with Jackrabbit 2.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855881#action_12855881 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OCM-43: -- Any update on the failing tests? PS. Quite a large part

RE: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Thomas Thanks for the update. I'll try both. With regard to concurrency, are there any plans for jackrabbit to support concurrency out of the box? I did see a thread in the mailing list, but wasn't sure of the outcome. Regards George -Original Message- From: Thomas Müller

Re: AccessManager in Jackrabbit v1.5

Hallo, I need help on this Jackrabbit AccessManager. I have custome AccessManager, providing access security based on the logged account and the permissions an account has. Basically, the permissions apply over a folder (kind of) - one can see a folder, put some items in it, edit these items,

[jira] Created: (JCR-2600) AbstractLoginModule logs a warning on anonymous logins

AbstractLoginModule logs a warning on anonymous logins -- Key: JCR-2600 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2600 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository Issue Type: Bug

Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Hi, With regard to concurrency, are there any plans for jackrabbit to support concurrency out of the box? If you use one session for each thread then it should already work. It's a bug if it doesn't. In any case I would use one session per thread, no matter if a future version of Jackrabbit

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-2600) AbstractLoginModule logs a warning on anonymous logins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-2600. Resolution: Fixed Fixed in revision 933203 and merged to the 2.1 branch in revision 933209.

RE: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Thomas We still hit problems when we attempted to add nodes, concurrently, to existing nodes (I think the message was something like attempting to update a node that is already being updated). We had to lock the node, update, and then release. Regards George -Original Message-

[jira] Resolved: (JCR-2457) Command line access to remote repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting resolved JCR-2457. Assignee: Jukka Zitting Resolution: Fixed The code has been integrated to trunk and the 2.1

Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2579 ? On 4/12/10 9:25 AM, george.sib...@bt.com wrote: Thomas We still hit problems when we attempted to add nodes, concurrently, to existing nodes (I think the message was something like attempting to update a node that is already

[jira] Commented: (JCR-1242) Improve serialization of NodeReferences for BundleDB PMs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855995#action_12855995 ] Arthur Meyer commented on JCR-1242: --- Can we update and apply this patch? This patch

[jira] Updated: (JCR-1242) Improve serialization of NodeReferences for BundleDB PMs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arthur Meyer updated JCR-1242: -- Attachment: JCR-1242_update.patch Attached updated version of the original patch Improve serialization

RE: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance

Yes, exactly. Many thanks. -Original Message- From: Justin Edelson [mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com] Sent: 12 April 2010 15:38 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 1.6.0 Write Performance This looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2579 ? On 4/12/10 9:25

Build failed in Hudson: Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14 #435

See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14/435/ -- Started by upstream project Jackrabbit-trunk build number Building remotely on vesta.apache.org (Ubuntu) Updating

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14 #435

Hi, On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote: See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Jackrabbit-trunk-tests-java14/435/ [...] Building remotely on vesta.apache.org (Ubuntu) [...] Reason: Cannot find parent:

flushing the event queue

Is there any good way to flush the event queue in Jackrabbit 2? I'm trying to do this in the context of an integration test. I can get the effect I want using SynchronousEventListener, but this creates a Jackrabbit dependency in a place where their shouldn't be one. Thanks, Justin