Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread fanrong, sun
Hi, I would prefer to upgrade lucene to v4.x in a separate branch. frank 在 2013-10-7，下午11:58，Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org 写道： Hi, I'm thinking about the potential migration of Jackrabbit to Lucene 4. This represents quite a huge work, as many Lucene core API have completely

RE: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Cédric, most of the development effort currently goes into Apache Oak, which will replace Jackrabbit 2.x at some point. This means Jackrabbit 2.x is pretty much in maintenance mode. I don't want to discourage you from doing this, but I will probably not have the time to help on this...

Re: node naming

2013-10-09 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2013-10-08 22:13, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: And these arbitrary keys really require that two different normalization forms remain different? I'm afraid they probably do. While it's unlikely for unnormalized data

Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi, Ok I see. Thanks for your feedback. I most likely won't dive alone in this task, given that there's some really tricky parts. On the other hand, Oak is currently not production-ready, so I have to stick to JR 2.x for now. I'll probably look at a way to isolate Jackrabbit+Lucene in a

Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread Torgeir Veimo
How about using an external elasticsearch or solr instance instead of lucene for your indexing needs? On 9 October 2013 18:21, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Ok I see. Thanks for your feedback. I most likely won't dive alone in this task, given that there's some really tricky

Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread fanrong, sun
That would be great if this idea can be achieved. frank 在 2013-10-9，下午6:20，Torgeir Veimo torgeir.ve...@gmail.com 写道： How about using an external elasticsearch or solr instance instead of lucene for your indexing needs? On 9 October 2013 18:21, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: Hi,

Re: Upgrade to Lucene 4 ?

2013-10-09 Thread Cédric Damioli
It's not an option for my current problems, where I should integrate already-partially-existing Lucene 4 code (especially using the facet and spatial modules) into a Jackrabbit-based product. In a first approach I thought migrating Jackrabbit to Lucene 4. I've even thought about integrating

Re: node naming

2013-10-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: That sounds like you propose to do the normalization-on-lookup one layer above the JCR API. Won't that be extremely expensive? In some cases yes. However, there shouldn't be any noticeable overhead in the common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.6.4

2013-10-09 Thread Cédric Damioli
[INFO] [INFO] ALL CHECKS OK [INFO] [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.6.4 Regards, Cédric

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.5

2013-10-09 Thread Cédric Damioli
Hi Jukka, The check-release.sh fails with the following message: [INFO] 5. Compare svn tag with src zip contents [INFO] [INFO]Exporting https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.4.5... [INFO]Unzipping jackrabbit-2.4.5-src.zip... [INFO]Comparing sources... [INFO] diff -b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.5

2013-10-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: The check-release.sh fails with the following message: [...] [ERROR] NOT OK: Tagged sources are different from those in the archive Hmm, that is quite weird, the check works for me. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.5

2013-10-09 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: The check-release.sh fails with the following message: [...] [ERROR] NOT OK: Tagged sources are different from those in the archive

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.4.5

2013-10-09 Thread Julian Reschke
On 2013-10-09 20:10, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Cédric Damioli cdami...@apache.org wrote: The check-release.sh fails with the following message: [...] [ERROR] NOT OK: Tagged sources

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10

2013-10-09 Thread Tommaso Teofili
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10 Tommaso 2013/10/3 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.10 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.10/ The release candidate is a zip archive of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10

2013-10-09 Thread Alex Parvulescu
hi, On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.comwrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote passes as