[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1183 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1183) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1183/ to view the results. Changes: [amitj] OAK-4848: Improve oak-blob-cloud tests Test

[Oak origin/1.4] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1182 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1182) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1182/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-4840: Incorrect branch commit value [dj]

[Oak origin/trunk] Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix - Build # 1181 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix (build #1181) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/1181/ to view the results. Changes: [mreutegg] OAK-4826: Auto removal of orphaned checkpoints

adaptTo() 2016 - slides online

the slides of the adaptTo() 2016 conference in berlin are now online - 25 talks plus lightning talks, 200 participants. you find the slides and code samples here: https://adapt.to/2016/schedule and some images... (more to follow) https://adapt.to/2016/en/conference/gallery.html Stefan

[jira] [Resolved] (JCR-3106) Upgrade Lucene to 3.6.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-3106. --- Resolution: Duplicate Resolving as duplicate of JCR-3696. > Upgrade Lucene to 3.6.2 >

[jira] [Resolved] (JCR-4036) Upgrade to latest lucene-core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-4036. --- Resolution: Duplicate Upgrading the Lucene dependency in Jackrabbit is not that easy because

[jira] [Resolved] (JCR-3669) Improve index performance by upgrading lucene to 4.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger resolved JCR-3669. --- Resolution: Duplicate Resolving as duplicate of JCR-3696. > Improve index performance by

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-128) System maintained cache nodes should be ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529718#comment-15529718 ] Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCRVLT-128: - my fix exactly fixes the update case :-) but I would

[jira] [Created] (JCR-4036) Upgrade to latest lucene-core

Sebastian Dietrich created JCR-4036: --- Summary: Upgrade to latest lucene-core Key: JCR-4036 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4036 Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository Issue

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-128) System maintained cache nodes should be ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529500#comment-15529500 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on JCRVLT-128: [~tri...@apache.org] that fix doesn't seem to help, as

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15529079#comment-15529079 ] Stefan Egli commented on JCR-4035: -- So, assuming we add something like below, should we add a note that

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefan Egli updated JCR-4035: - Description: For some types of applications it might be useful to specify a nodetype that any parent (ie

Re: Oak 1.5.11 release plan

Hi Davide, Could we delay the release until tomorrow? I want to check in some changes for OAK-4838/OAK-4848. I have made the issues blocker for the release. Thanks Amit On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > Hello team, > > I'm planning to cut Oak 1.5.11

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528991#comment-15528991 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-4035: Direct parent only currently, yes. > consider supporting

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528987#comment-15528987 ] Stefan Egli commented on JCR-4035: -- I was referring to the entire parent/grandparent/grand-grandparent etc

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15528970#comment-15528970 ] Michael Dürig commented on JCR-4035: bq. nodetype that any parent must have This is how node type

[jira] [Created] (JCR-4035) consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation

Stefan Egli created JCR-4035: Summary: consider supporting parentNodeTypes filtering in observation Key: JCR-4035 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4035 Project: Jackrabbit Content