,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.4 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.4/
See the included RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details on release
contents and latest changes. The release candidate was built from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit
Hi,
On Jan 11, 2008 3:28 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Jackrabbit 1.4. The
vote is on for the next 72 hours and passes if at least three +1 votes
are cast.
The vote passes with the following three binding +1 votes and one
files etc.
Regards and have a nice weekend
Felix
Am Freitag, den 11.01.2008, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
Hi,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Jackrabbit 1.4 release at
http://people.apache.org/~jukka/jackrabbit/1.4/
See the included RELEASE-NOTES.txt file for details
Hi,
On Jan 11, 2008 4:56 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]ArrayHitsTest.java
Ah, sorry for missing that. I thought I had covered everything already
in JCR-1283 and didn't pay too much attention on changes that went in
after that.
does not have a license header at all.
Hi Jukka.
In the release notes, shouldn't there be a note about the data store?
Regards,
Esteban Franqueiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be
Hi,
On Jan 11, 2008 4:26 PM, Esteban Franqueiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the release notes, shouldn't there be a note about the data store?
I mention a new storage model for binary content in addition to
listing the data store feature issues in the change log.
Ja! Sorry, I must have
-1 (non binding):
Bundled DB PM + JNDI issue 1305
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1305)
This causes troubles in an application server environment and only
requires a very
small fix as suggested in the issue.
It would be great if we could get this fixed for 1.4 release.
Cheers,
Hi,
On Jan 11, 2008 4:26 PM, Esteban Franqueiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the release notes, shouldn't there be a note about the data store?
I mention a new storage model for binary content in addition to
listing the data store feature issues in the change log.
We don't yet have too much
Hi,
On 9/20/07, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the growth of the number of more or less independent top-level
sub-projects in Jackrabbit, we should probably start again thinking of
having independent releases ?
For example, I could imagine, that OCM has definitely a
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 9/11/07, ruchi goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ?
I don't yet have any exact dates, but I'd expect at least a month or
two before the release is ready. At least we still need to finalize
the data
Esteban Franqueiro wrote:
We're having trouble with JCR-962. We have JR 1.3.1 with the 962 patch
applied, and we still get deadlocks in almost every run of
ConcurrentVersioningWithTransactionsTest and
ConcurrentCheckinMixedTransactionTest. We also run those tests against trunk
but they didn't
Hi,
On 9/11/07, ruchi goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ?
I don't yet have any exact dates, but I'd expect at least a month or
two before the release is ready. At least we still need to finalize
the data store implementation and handle
Hi,
On 9/11/07, ruchi goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ?
I don't yet have any exact dates, but I'd expect at least a month or
two before the release is ready. At least we still need to finalize
the data store implementation
Hi,
What is the expected time frame for release of Jackrabbit 1.4 ?
Thanks,
Ruchi
14 matches
Mail list logo
