[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13979554#comment-13979554
]
Shankar Pednekar commented on JCR-3763:
---
The issue is with following piece of code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13979554#comment-13979554
]
Shankar Pednekar edited comment on JCR-3763 at 4/24/14 10:30 AM:
Manfred Baedke created JCR-3773:
---
Summary: Lucene ConsistencyCheck reports nodes under
/jcr:system/jcr:nodeTypes as deleted
Key: JCR-3773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3773
Project:
Hi,
currently it is not possible to sort query results by document order
if respectDocumentOrder is left at the default of false in the workspace
configuration.
The need to support such sorting per query was discussed years back when
the default setting was changed to false in JCR-1237 (and
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.6.
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Filevault 3.1.6
BR,
Jukka Zitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3772:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
As part of OAK-1741 I was changing the Version of exported packages to
1.0.0. Looking at the interfaces which are part of exported packages I
do not see usage of ConsumerType/ProviderType annotations [1]
In brief and simple terms the interfaces which are expected to be
implemented by users of Oak
Hi,
I was checking the CI status for Oak trunk and it seems build are not
getting built at [1] and [2].
Do we have to enable it somehow?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds
[2] http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/
Hi Chetan,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
...I was checking the CI status for Oak trunk and it seems build are not
getting built at [1] and [2]...
I don't know about travis but ci.apache.org is currently not working,
AFAIK there was a
Hi,
I'm running the unit tests on the 1.0 branch and I saw the Clock test
failing twice:
Failed tests: testClockDrift(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.stats.ClockTest):
Clock.Fast unexpected drift ater 100ms: -9ms (estimated limit was 5ms,
measured granularity was 1.0ms)
Failed tests:
+1, not sure whether we have enough resources to do this in time for 1.0
though. Maybe we could do it where obvious?
Michael
On 24.4.14 10:48 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
As part of OAK-1741 I was changing the Version of exported packages to
1.0.0. Looking at the interfaces which are part of
I'm seeing this test fail each time. Am I the only one experiencing this?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 24.4.14 2:01 , Alex Parvulescu wrote:
Failed tests: testClockDrift(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.stats.
ClockTest):
Clock.Fast unexpected
I see it from time to time, but not always. maybe one out of ten
times
regards
marcel
-Original Message-
From: Alex Parvulescu [mailto:alex.parvule...@gmail.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 24. April 2014 14:25
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unit tests on 1.0 branch
On 24.4.14 2:19 , Michael Dürig wrote:
On 24.4.14 2:01 , Alex Parvulescu wrote:
Failed tests:
testClockDrift(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.stats.ClockTest):
Clock.Fast unexpected drift ater 100ms: -9ms (estimated limit was 5ms,
measured granularity was 1.0ms)
Most likely caused by
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently we are having following interfaces as part of exported
packages [2]. Looking at the list I believe most are of ProviderType
i.e. provided by Oak and not required by Oak API users.
Not really.
15 matches
Mail list logo
