[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-30 Thread Amit Jain
Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Cédric Damioli +1 KÖLL Claus +1 Amit Jain Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Amit On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.10.2 release is

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-29 Thread KÖLL Claus
+1 greets claus

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-29 Thread Cédric Damioli
[INFO] [INFO] ALL CHECKS OK [INFO] [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-29 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 23/03/16 17:48, "Davide Giannella" wrote: >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2. >The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-28 Thread Amit Jain
Hi, Since, the voting period overlapped with the long weekend we should we extend the vote another 72 hours. Thanks Amit On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.10.2 release is available at: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-28 Thread Amit Jain
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Davide Giannella wrote: > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. +1 Release this package as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-24 Thread Davide Giannella
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2 Davide

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2016-03-23 Thread Davide Giannella
A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.10.2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.10.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.10.2/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive is

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Hi, I've created a branch for 2.10.x [1]. The version number is back to 2.10.2-SNAPSHOT. Commits on JCR-3880, JCR-3885, and JCR-3894 have been reverted on the new 2.10 branch because they contained changes to the api. The fix version of these issues has been updated to 2.11.0. The trunk is now on

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Hi Davide, With regard to creating a branch, if you want I can do that for you, as well as the related tasks of creating the JIRA versions, reverting the relevant commits on the branch, etc. Let me know if you want any help. -- Unico On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Davide Giannella

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Davide Giannella
Hello Team, the vote DOESN'T pass as follows -1 Davide Giannella -1 Unico Hommes -1 Bart van der Schans Thanks for voting. I'll proceed with deletes and drops -- Davide

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Unico Hommes
Good point. I'll take care of it during the branching. -- Unico On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote: On 10/08/2015 09:05, Davide Giannella wrote: Hello Team, the vote DOESN'T pass as follows -1 Davide Giannella -1 Unico Hommes -1 Bart van der Schans

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Davide Giannella
On 10/08/2015 10:49, Unico Hommes wrote: Hi Davide, With regard to creating a branch, if you want I can do that for you, as well as the related tasks of creating the JIRA versions, reverting the relevant commits on the branch, etc. Let me know if you want any help. If you could take care of

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Davide Giannella
On 10/08/2015 09:05, Davide Giannella wrote: Hello Team, the vote DOESN'T pass as follows -1 Davide Giannella -1 Unico Hommes -1 Bart van der Schans Thanks for voting. I'll proceed with deletes and drops It's not mentioned on the release-steps, but shall I revert the JR poms to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-10 Thread Unico Hommes
The new branch location: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/branches/2.10/ On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Unico Hommes un...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've created a branch for 2.10.x [1]. The version number is back to 2.10.2-SNAPSHOT. Commits on JCR-3880, JCR-3885, and JCR-3894 have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-06 Thread Michael Dürig
On 6.8.15 10:51 , Angela Schreiber wrote: hi -1 for reverting the changes. i only applied them to the trunk (and not to a released branch, which i never intended to do) and i don't see any reason why extending the API should not be possible there. This is only about reverting so we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-06 Thread Bart van der Schans
Hi Chetan, On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote: i am fine... quite frankly i am surprised to see that there is no 2.10 branch. I think this was discussed earlier [1]. Looks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-06 Thread Unico Hommes
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote: hi -1 for reverting the changes. i only applied them to the trunk (and not to a released branch, which i never intended to do) and i don't see any reason why extending the API should not be possible there. the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-06 Thread Angela Schreiber
hi ok i see... as long as my improvmeents stay (or get properly reapplied) on jackrabbit trunk and get released with the next (instable) 2.x.y, i am all fine and don't mind about the details on how we get there... i just don't want to run after a broken oak. what we also might want to consider

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-06 Thread Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Angela Schreiber anch...@adobe.com wrote: i am fine... quite frankly i am surprised to see that there is no 2.10 branch. I think this was discussed earlier [1]. Looks like we would have to revisit that decision and continue with stable/unstable releases Chetan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Davide Giannella
[X] -1 Do not release this package because... it says svn: E17: URL 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.10.2' doesn't exist and indeed it doesn't. By looking at SVN I can find that since 2.10.1 the tag created are `jackrabbit-VERSION` rather than `VERSION`. I searched

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Amit Jain
Hi Davide, 2.10.1 was mistakenly tagged as jackrabbit-2.10.1 and maybe that carried over. Not sure whether its an option here but can't we just rename the tag in svn? Thanks Amit On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote: [X] -1 Do not release this package

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Davide Giannella
On 05/08/2015 10:01, Amit Jain wrote: Hi Davide, 2.10.1 was mistakenly tagged as jackrabbit-2.10.1 and maybe that carried over. Not sure whether its an option here but can't we just rename the tag in svn? Theoretically possible by something like svn mv \

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Unico Hommes
I'm also -1 on this release but for a different reason. It seems that there are (again) API changes in a maintenance tag [1]. I've already indicated that I don't agree with this procedure. That API changes need to be made on a 2.12 branch only. 1. Changesets 1694048 and 1693235 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Davide Giannella
On 05/08/2015 14:27, Davide Giannella wrote: On 05/08/2015 10:01, Amit Jain wrote: Hi Davide, 2.10.1 was mistakenly tagged as jackrabbit-2.10.1 and maybe that carried over. Not sure whether its an option here but can't we just rename the tag in svn? Theoretically possible by something

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Bart van der Schans
Hi guys, I really have to agree with Unico here. We should not make API changes in the stable branch. These changes create (a lot of) unexpected work for everybody depending on Jackrabbit with their own projects. If we do need API changes we have to branch off 2.10 first in a stable maintenance

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-05 Thread Davide Giannella
On 05/08/2015 17:58, Bart van der Schans wrote: Hi guys, I really have to agree with Unico here. We should not make API changes in the stable branch. These changes create (a lot of) unexpected work for everybody depending on Jackrabbit with their own projects. If we do need API changes we

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.10.2

2015-08-04 Thread Davide Giannella
A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.10.2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/2.10.2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/tags/2.10.2/ The SHA1 checksum of the archive is