On 20 October 2011 11:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
> Did you have some time to review patch for issue 51861 ? If yes Are you OK
> if I commit it ?
I had a look, and I think it is better, but I suspect that there are
still some edge cases that may cause issues.
As the
Hello Sebb,
Did you have some time to review patch for issue 51861 ? If yes Are you OK
if I commit it ?
In fact I am doing some load tests on GWT and it is really difficult to work
without it.
Hope you have some time to take it into account.
Regards
Philippe
Hello Sebb,
I submitted a new version of patch that takes into account the folliwing:
- if the raw flag is set, we don't do a merge; otherwise keep current
behaviour (I noticed that if there is only one parameter in request with no
name and there are parameters in request default, only p
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 October 2011 10:41, Philippe Mouawad
> wrote:
> > Hello Sebb,
> > Regarding this, if we add a checkbox in Request Sampler GUI to indicate
> to
> > user that merge will occur on request.
> > This would be checked by default unless user switches
On 9 October 2011 10:41, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
> Regarding this, if we add a checkbox in Request Sampler GUI to indicate to
> user that merge will occur on request.
> This would be checked by default unless user switches to RAW body, if switch
> is accepted, checkbox is unchecked
>
Hello Sebb,
Regarding this, if we add a checkbox in Request Sampler GUI to indicate to
user that merge will occur on request.
This would be checked by default unless user switches to RAW body, if switch
is accepted, checkbox is unchecked
So we would have this behaviour:
- RAW body used, no mer
On 28 September 2011 19:59, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
> Thanks for the analysis.
> I agree with you and will try to handle these cases, do you prefer a
> discussion in mailing list or in issue ?
Mailing list.
-
To un
Hello Sebb,
Thanks for the analysis.
I agree with you and will try to handle these cases, do you prefer a
discussion in mailing list or in issue ?
No problem for me if it is not taken into account in this release provided
it is in next or not too far in the future so that patches are still valid
:
If HttpDefaults and HttpRequest both use Parameters, then the body is
created from both sets of parameters.
When the body is being built, if any of the parameters have names,
only named parameters are kept.
Any unnamed parameters are ignored.
It's not possible to mix named and unnamed parameters;
Hello Sebb,
I submitted a new patch version in 51861.
Regards
Philippe
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Sebb,
> Did you have some time to look at patch for issue 51861 ?
> Are there any pending problems in submitted pa
Hello Sebb,
Did you have some time to look at patch for issue 51861 ?
Are there any pending problems in submitted patch ?
Thank you
Regards
Philippe
11 matches
Mail list logo
