Re: Moving past Guava 20

2018-02-21 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:33:52 -0800 Andrew Gaul wrote: > To establish the current state, I believe that jclouds works with Java > 6-8 and 9 with --add-modules java.xml.bind For the record I do not believe I had to modify JClouds at all for 9. It is more dependencies causing

Re: Moving past Guava 20

2018-02-21 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:47:36 -0800 Andrew Gaul wrote: > Looking at the JCLOUDS-1xxx issues (September 2015 to present), our > users reported 8 JDK 7 issues and 8 JDK 8 issues. You can repeat this > analysis via: That does not really help favor one over the other. Really seems

Re: Moving past Guava 20

2018-02-20 Thread Andrew Gaul
Looking at the JCLOUDS-1xxx issues (September 2015 to present), our users reported 8 JDK 7 issues and 8 JDK 8 issues. You can repeat this analysis via: for i in `seq 1400`; do echo $i; wget https://issues.apache.org/jira/si/jira.issueviews:issue-xml/JCLOUDS-$i/JCLOUDS-$i.xml; done grep -A1 ''

Re: Moving past Guava 20

2018-02-20 Thread Andrew Gaul
To establish the current state, I believe that jclouds works with Java 6-8 and 9 with --add-modules java.xml.bind and Guava 18-23, although I will defer to you about the lack of 22+ support. Guava has proven to be a painful dependency and one we should minimize going forward, even with the