+1
Source archive tested and built. All else looks good.
Dave
On 27/12/2022 16:27, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi,
Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.7.0.
This is the second release candidate.
The deadline is
Friday, 30th December 2022 at 18:00 UTC
Please vote to approve this
in the same cluster for months before
it was released, including simulating the traffic patterns as closely as
we could with no hint of a problem. So replicating reliably may be
tricky :( ]
Dave
Andy
On 17/02/2021 17:55, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the comments.
We'll
.
Yes, one of the things we're testing is shifting to TDB2 to see if that
changes the behaviour. Since we're not seeing any clear pattern of
increased load it feels like a long shot but would at least eliminate
that factor and may shed further light.
Thanks again.
Dave
Andy
On 17/02
of connections.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:50 AM Dave Reynolds
wrote:
We have a mysterious problem with fuseki in production that we've not
seen before. Posting in case anyone has seen something similar and has
any advice but I realise there's not really much here to go on.
Environment:
Fuseki 3.17
We have a mysterious problem with fuseki in production that we've not
seen before. Posting in case anyone has seen something similar and has
any advice but I realise there's not really much here to go on.
Environment:
Fuseki 3.17 (was 3.16, tried upgrade just in case) using TDB1
OpenJDK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17283314#comment-17283314
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-2032:
-
Thanks for covering this one [~andy].
> Support "https
+0 no objection
Dave
On 05/02/2021 10:04, Andy Seaborne wrote:
This is a decision by lazy consensus[*].
Let's rename the default branch as 'main' for both the code repo and the
site repo.
The process is:
1/ We create a repo branch 'main'
2/ Ask infra to make it the default
3/ We remote
On 02/02/2021 14:42, Andrew Crapo wrote:
I'm using Jena 3.16.0. In Rule$Parser.parseNode, the prefixes that are
valid do NOT include "https". However, "https" is showing up in OWL
ontologies, making rules referencing those ontologies invalid when parsed.
Is there a plan to add "https" to valid
On 18/09/2020 07:23, Jeffrey Kenneth Tyzzer wrote:
Hello, Group.
I have two questions re: the Fuseki reasoner (we’re using v.3.14.0 but the
questions are, I think, version-agnostic):
1. Five or so years ago, Andy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17163314#comment-17163314
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1938:
-
As noted earlier the OWL axioms are:
* {{owl:Class rdf:type
+1
Dave
On 07/01/2020 15:17, Claude Warren wrote:
+1 I like this idea
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:02 PM Merlin Bögershausen <
merlin.boegershau...@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
+1
Am Di, Jan 7, 2020 at 14:44 schrieb Andy Seaborne :
+1
On 07/01/2020 13:58, Aaron Coburn wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Aaron
On
On 21/11/2019 18:30, ajs6f wrote:
I would like to look at the fairly large number of methods on classes like Resource and
Model and see if we can corral and regularize them a bit. I'm not against functionality,
of course, but we've built up those APIs via the "coral reef" model
(accumulation)
On leave I'm afraid, without enough bandwidth to do tests (not that I've
a good track record on voting anyway).
Dave
On 03/10/2019 11:40, Aaron Coburn wrote:
Next week works for me.
Thanks, Aaron
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 04:42 A. Soroka wrote:
I should be able to test on Linux and vote.
in a branch and then issuing a PR
against that branch but maybe that's not the right thing to do with the
apache setup. Apologies if I've messed up. Should I have done this is my
own fork instead?
Dave
On 09/06/2019 22:56, Dave Reynolds wrote:
I've spent some time on this but with limited results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16875732#comment-16875732
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1719:
-
Was able to reduce this to a simpler test case which doesn't
On 08/06/2019 12:22, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
Sure, I'll try to take a look over the weekend if I can get a working
dev environment set up.
Dave
On 07/06/2019 13:46, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Dave,
I am hoping you can give me a some pointers so I can solve JENA-1719.
https://issues.apach
Hi Andy,
Sure, I'll try to take a look over the weekend if I can get a working
dev environment set up.
Dave
On 07/06/2019 13:46, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Dave,
I am hoping you can give me a some pointers so I can solve JENA-1719.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1719
Setup:
data
It has been a while since I had any involvement in this area of the code
and it may have all changed in the interim but ...
There used to be an assumption that data types are always registered and
that the same instance of a datatype object will be used by all literals
with that datatype. So
On 12/05/18 17:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/05/18 17:26, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 11/05/18 20:35, ajs6f wrote:
On May 9, 2018, at 3:31 AM, Dave Reynolds
<dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/05/18 16:55, ajs6f wrote:
Forking a thread off to dev@:
Do we have a global policy
On 11/05/18 20:35, ajs6f wrote:
On May 9, 2018, at 3:31 AM, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/05/18 16:55, ajs6f wrote:
Forking a thread off to dev@:
Do we have a global policy about where null is accepted as a wildcard? I know
it works in at least some place
On 08/05/18 16:55, ajs6f wrote:
Forking a thread off to dev@:
Do we have a global policy about where null is accepted as a wildcard? I know
it works in at least some places...
I would love to (over an appropriate period of time and with lots of warnings
and deprecation and so forth) stop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16432566#comment-16432566
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1518:
-
Confirmed that the issue exists. Amazing it hasn't been noticed
On 07/03/18 17:23, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 07/03/18 16:51, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 07/03/18 16:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-1499 may have knock on effects.
Adding a quad and deleting a quad and still listing the graph name
would be OK but "contains graph" returns false in TI
he graph name.
Does this script illustrate the effect?
Yes with one correction. Line 18 should be:
G5X="$(wwwenc $G5)"
rather than:
G5X="$(wwwenc $G)"
With that correction that this illustrates the effect for me.
Dave
Andy
On 07/03/18 14:14, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 07/03
On 07/03/18 12:59, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 06/03/18 22:43, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for confirming you seeing something similar, glad I wasn't
hallucinating!
Not sure any more that I am :-|
There are ghost graphs in a TIM dataset after deletion, JENA-1499, but
I'm not seeing
Could you try
''-quotes please?
I'll try step 7.
Andy
On 05/03/18 23:56, Dave Reynolds wrote:
I've been trying to debug some weird behaviour in my test cases and
think they are due to a bug in memory-backed fuseki stores.
However, the behaviour is so odd and hard to reproduce I'd like
I've been trying to debug some weird behaviour in my test cases and
think they are due to a bug in memory-backed fuseki stores.
However, the behaviour is so odd and hard to reproduce I'd like some
confirmation that someone else sees the same effect before opening a JIRA.
# Steps to reproduce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379980#comment-16379980
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1496 at 2/28/18 9:03 AM:
--
This seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379980#comment-16379980
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1496:
-
This seems to be a question for the email list rather than a bug
connection hangs around for IIRC at least 2 minutes.
The improvements in HttpClient usage don't change this although pooling
might make it worse.
Makes me appreciate the GC even more.
Andy
On 08/12/17 23:52, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi,
Several test cases later I'm now sure this is my fault,
it when it was so rock solid under Jena 3.1.1
but I'm sure the problem is on my side.]
Dave
On 08/12/17 22:06, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi,
On 08/12/17 19:39, ajs6f wrote:
Dave--
Jena switched HTTP Commons versions a good bit from 3.1.1 to now, so
that may be part of it. I will look into whether
of http client/jena or whether it really is Jena.
If I can get it pinned down to the latter then I'll open a JIRA.
Dave
On Dec 8, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks, that's useful to know but just raising the limit will just make it less
fr
can construct your own client by
calling setMaxConnPerRoute() and setMaxConnTotal() on the builder to set your
desired settings.
Rob
On 08/12/2017, 16:44, "Dave Reynolds" <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I've being updating some rather old libraries that u
P.S. Looking more closely then switching to HttpClients.createDefault()
or HttpClients.createMinimal() does have an effect. It reduces the
number of inflight requests before fatal lock from 5 down to 3.
Dave
On 08/12/17 16:44, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi,
I've being updating some rather old
Hi,
I've being updating some rather old libraries that use Jena to issue
sparql requests to a remote endpoint and pull back results.
These work under Jena 3.1.1 but there's a fatal problem under Jena 3.2.0
and later ...
If I issue 6 concurrent execSelect calls to a remote sparql endpoint
On 03/11/17 07:57, Osma Suominen wrote:
Congratulations, and thank you Andy for taking such good care of the
release!
+1
Dave
-Osma
PS. I gave some comments on TDB2 on 27 October. I hope to be able to
contribute more testing and feedback.
Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 03.11.2017 klo 01:22:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16235722#comment-16235722
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1415:
-
No problem.
On reflection, the way OpenPellet is handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16235417#comment-16235417
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1415:
-
The conversion to Individual by Jena only tests whether
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16235417#comment-16235417
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1415 at 11/2/17 8:56 AM:
--
The conversion
On 22/09/17 14:56, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/09/17 14:55, Andy Seaborne wrote:
This VOTE is to accept a contribution of software for TDB2 comprising
of the contents of the GitHub repository:
https://github.com/afs/mantis
as of commit 71a70fd76ebc35cda26258bad0459e97f9860b04
Sounds good to me, would be great to have this in the code base and
would be happy to +1 such a vote.
Dave
On 04/09/17 23:27, Andy Seaborne wrote:
I'd like to offer TDB2 as a contribution to Apache Jena.
It is by no means "finished" (is anything software ever finished?) but
it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16121237#comment-16121237
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1380:
-
It's largely a manpower issue.
It is possible to work with OWL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16121217#comment-16121217
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1380:
-
That exception is thrown if you are trying to retrieve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16121150#comment-16121150
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1380:
-
What's the exception?
Since you are using Pellet, and since
On 22/07/17 12:10, Dave Reynolds wrote:
# Summary
We've started seeing an unusual JVM error message in some fuseki
deployments:
java.lang.InternalError: a fault occurred in a recent unsafe memory
access operation in compiled Java code
I don't think this is a Jena issue so not raising
On 23/07/17 11:28, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/07/17 21:23, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On 22/07/17 20:51, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/07/17 18:03, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/07/17 12:10, Dave Reynolds wrote:
# Summary
We've started seeing an unusual JVM error message in some fuseki
On 22/07/17 20:51, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/07/17 18:03, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 22/07/17 12:10, Dave Reynolds wrote:
# Summary
We've started seeing an unusual JVM error message in some fuseki
deployments:
java.lang.InternalError: a fault occurred in a recent unsafe memory
access
# Summary
We've started seeing an unusual JVM error message in some fuseki
deployments:
java.lang.InternalError: a fault occurred in a recent unsafe memory
access operation in compiled Java code
I don't think this is a Jena issue so not raising a Jira, but if anyone
has seen this and has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16050114#comment-16050114
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1359 at 6/15/17 7:52 AM:
--
It has never
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16050114#comment-16050114
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1359:
-
It has never been part of the contract for Literal.getValue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds closed JENA-1337.
---
> Trying to write an infered model to a String or a file never e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds resolved JENA-1337.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Dave Reynolds
Thanks for confirming.
Scalability
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16010785#comment-16010785
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1337 at 5/15/17 4:36 PM:
--
Since you say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16010785#comment-16010785
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1337:
-
Since you say the ontologies are "huge" they
+1 thanks Andy.
Dave
On 25/04/17 14:52, Andy Seaborne wrote:
How does this sound as the route to 3.3.0?
Merge these PRs (which I think are all ready to go):
PR#245 :: Maven module for ElasticSearch, not in Fuseki2 in 3.3.0
PR#243 :: JENA-1324: Check for spaces in URIs (if RDF 1.1)
PR#242
The reasoners store all their information in memory.
Your mention of transactions suggests that you are storing into a TDB or
other database-backed store. That will not enable the reasoner to scale
and will just slow things down. You'll get better performance by loading
the data into memory
On 10/01/17 19:31, Paul Houle wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, at 05:31 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Great that this works for you but the design centre for Jena Rules was
deductive closure not event-condition-action (ECA) or reactive rules.
One of the things I think about is why production
o...@ontology2.com On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, at 02:57 PM,
Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Claude,
On 09/01/17 10:55, Claude Warren wrote:
I am digging into reasoners for the first time in a long time and have a
couple of questions.
What I am trying to do is the following:
Assume data:
5
I want a rule
Hi Claude,
On 09/01/17 10:55, Claude Warren wrote:
I am digging into reasoners for the first time in a long time and have a
couple of questions.
What I am trying to do is the following:
Assume data:
5
I want a rule that will produce
5
So something like:
(?x my:sameValue ?y)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670719#comment-15670719
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1260:
-
Yes, sorry. I shouldn't have included that, as well as being
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670611#comment-15670611
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1260 at 11/16/16 2:56 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670611#comment-15670611
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1260:
-
The TransitiveEngine is a bit of special case because it has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670295#comment-15670295
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1260:
-
I've tried to test via the sharedness but the TransitiveEngine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670249#comment-15670249
]
Dave Reynolds edited comment on JENA-1260 at 11/16/16 11:50 AM:
Been trying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15670249#comment-15670249
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1260:
-
Been trying to create a test case that more reliably provokes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15669912#comment-15669912
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1260:
-
Those HashSets really shouldn't be static, that would mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds reassigned JENA-1260:
---
Assignee: Dave Reynolds
> NullPointerException when using an inferencing model un
On 08/11/16 13:56, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Well, 3.1.1 should have been 3.2.0 so lets pretend 3.1.1 is 3.2.0-beta.
:-) So if we have to get out a bug-fixing "3.1.2" or anything even
quite soon, 3.2.0 is still a reasonable choice.
+1
Dave
It is much easier to set the version now. It sets into
+1
> + does everything work on Linux?
Build passed on Ubunbu 16.04, OpenJDK 1.8.
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
Validated with new key correctly.
> + are the checksums correct?
Yes.
> + is there a source archive?
Yes.
> + can the source archive really be built?
Yes, clean build from
is
stopping you from filtering those emails in your chosen email client.
Rob
On 24/10/2016 09:10, "Dave Reynolds" <dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com> wrote:
There have been student questions on the jena users list since long
before Jena moved into Apache. While there's a burst at
There have been student questions on the jena users list since long
before Jena moved into Apache. While there's a burst at the moment I
don't see it as particularly worse than historic levels.
In the past sometimes teachers have stepped in and stopped it, sometimes
not.
I'm not convinced
On 07/10/16 11:32, Claude Warren wrote:
So I guess the question is if you want to know say the temp recorded across
multiple devices at a specific time how hard is it to query.
Easy, find all observations about that time, don't filter on device.
or if you have devices that quantize time (say
Hi Claude,
We work with time sequence data in RDF, mostly for environmental
observation data. For that type of data we use the Data Cube vocabulary
with time being one of the dimensions.
Dave
On 07/10/16 10:16, Claude Warren wrote:
I have a project that is looking at doing time series type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15381300#comment-15381300
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1204:
-
Paul - marked as resolved, OK to close it?
> Independen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds resolved JENA-1204.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.1.1
> Independently Configurable BulitinRegis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15381298#comment-15381298
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1204:
-
Thanks for the contribution, looks good to me. I've merged
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds reassigned JENA-1204:
---
Assignee: Dave Reynolds
> Independently Configurable BulitinRegistry for Jena Rules Eng
n. I guess you would expect
the forward rule to fire and generate all the possible answers.
Dave
-- Paul Houle paul.ho...@ontology2.com On Thu, Jul 14, 2016, at 03:57
AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> 13/07/16 18:24, Paul Houle wrote:
> >In the following docs:
> >
> >https
13/07/16 18:24, Paul Houle wrote:
In the following docs:
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/inference/
The arithmetic builtins are described as such:
"Note that these do not run backwards, if in sum a and c are bound and b
is unbound then the test will fail rather than bind b to (c-a).
On 06/07/16 15:59, Paul Houle wrote:
One scenario I am looking at with the Jena Rules Engine is:
(i) facts get put into the model when something happens outside the
"system", and
(ii) this causes head actions to run which cause things to happen
Generally reactive or "ECA" (Event Condition
+1
Looks good to me.
Dave
On 05/07/16 16:31, Andy Seaborne wrote:
## Description:
Jena is a framework for developing Semantic Web and Linked Data
applications in Java. It provides implementation of W3C standards for
RDF and SPARQL.
## Issues:
Draft for comments:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds updated JENA-1204:
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug)
> Independently Configurable BulitinRegistry for Jena Ru
+1
Dave
On 29/04/16 17:45, A. Soroka wrote:
+1 from this non-committer to holding the cache work for now. A simple on-off
switch seems absolutely requisite, and preferably we would have fine-grained
controls. The sudden appearance of an always-on cache like this would represent
really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds resolved JENA-1030.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added <>-quoting of bare URIs.
> Rule.toString() prevents roundtripp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds reassigned JENA-1030:
---
Assignee: Dave Reynolds
> Rule.toString() prevents roundtripping rules between obje
+1
Dave
On 04/10/15 10:15, Andy Seaborne wrote:
DRAFT
(will send to the board after 24 hours waiting)
## Description:
A framework for developing Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
in Java.
## Activity:
The major release mentioned in the last report happened
On 19/09/15 17:54, Claude Warren wrote:
The contract test maven plugin produces reports about the contract tests.
It does not run them and can be ignored. However, I am curious as to why
the system can't find the plugin. It is in the maven repository (
On 19/09/15 17:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 19/09/15 16:04, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Importing current jena3 master into eclipse I get complaints about not
being able to find:
contract-test-maven-plugin:0.1.5:contract-test
I can mark that lifecyle phase to be ignored and get something
Importing current jena3 master into eclipse I get complaints about not
being able to find:
contract-test-maven-plugin:0.1.5:contract-test
I can mark that lifecyle phase to be ignored and get something that at
least seems to build but how is one supposed to set this up?
Also what's the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14790561#comment-14790561
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-1026:
-
Makes sense to me. Happy to do that if Stian agrees
Prior to the transition into Apache we made use of the domains
openjena.org and openjena.com.
These still exist and redirect to jena.apache.org.
The domains are up for renewal in the next couple of weeks. I am happy
to renew them if people feel this would be worthwhile, otherwise I'll
cancel
On 07/05/15 13:35, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 07/05/15 10:36, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Prior to the transition into Apache we made use of the domains
openjena.org and openjena.com.
These still exist and redirect to jena.apache.org.
The domains are up for renewal in the next couple of weeks. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14514469#comment-14514469
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-921:
Indeed the discussion at
https://groups.google.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds resolved JENA-921.
Resolution: Invalid
Visibility change in BaseInfGraph
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Reynolds closed JENA-921.
--
Visibility change in BaseInfGraph
-
Key: JENA-921
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14512595#comment-14512595
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-921:
Yes but it seems that Pellet is directly accessing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14512590#comment-14512590
]
Dave Reynolds commented on JENA-921:
Having looked that code more I suspect
Dave Reynolds created JENA-921:
--
Summary: Visibility change in BaseInfGraph
Key: JENA-921
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-921
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
+1
Dave
On 06/03/15 15:20, Rob Vesse wrote:
Works for me
Rob
On 06/03/2015 14:47, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
We have three new things:
Elephas
Fuseki2
OSGi
The current state of Fuseki2 UI is that the pivot table feature is
disabled for this release (done in common-config.js).
On 06/10/14 09:39, Claude Warren wrote:
I have the following code
data = TDBFactory.createDataset( dir.getAbsolutePath() );
data.begin( ReadWrite.WRITE);
// read 2 files into the model (approx 3.5K triples)
Model dataM = loadDir( ctxt,
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
