[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-2141:
Description:
This follows on from JENA-2139. It is the more general case.
This is query 1 from the
Hello !
I have a question related to the performance of the RDFWriter to JSON LD FRAME
format.
Currently I have to process 40k objects inside in a RDF file. When I process
them into JSON following the code:
JsonLDWriteContext ctx = new JsonLDWriteContext();
JsonLdOptions opts = new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402164#comment-17402164
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1948:
-
[PR#1050|https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1050] removes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-2150.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Graph name wrongly in-scope in BIND expression.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402278#comment-17402278
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2144:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402280#comment-17402280
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2150:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402281#comment-17402281
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2150:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402279#comment-17402279
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2006:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-2144.
-
Fix Version/s: Jena 4.2.0
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed bug but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402328#comment-17402328
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-2151:
-
What kind of iterator is being filtered and where might the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402277#comment-17402277
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2144:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1948.
-
Fix Version/s: Jena 4.2.0
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Resolution: Fixed
> Consider
Hi Ronald,
Jena used github/jsonld-java for its JSON-LD handling. Providing the
costs aren't going in the translation across the Jena/jsonld-java
boundary, then it is the cost in jsonld-java.
I haven't had the opportunity to check but it has been said that the
JSON-LD algorithms are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17402462#comment-17402462
]
Holger Knublauch commented on JENA-2151:
Here is a stack trace from where it reaches the
14 matches
Mail list logo