Re: Jena next

2019-11-15 Thread Marco Neumann
thank you for the link Claude, looks indeed like a very useful addition to a standard implementation. In particular when combined with an enhanced admin UI I would think. Marco On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:33 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Marco, > > The permissions layer [1] is a separate module that

Re: Jena next

2019-11-15 Thread Claude Warren
Marco, The permissions layer [1] is a separate module that wraps graph and model implementations with permissions checking. It can use Shiro (or whatever Fuseki uses). Basically, it uses the dynamic proxy mechanism to intercept "interesting" calls to graph and model to filter out triples that

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1778) COUNT(DISTINCT *) can generate incorrect results.

2019-11-15 Thread Andy Seaborne (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1778. - Fix Version/s: Jena 3.14.0 Resolution: Fixed > COUNT(DISTINCT *) can generate incorrect

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1776) RDFConnection with user/password fails intermittently on the second call.

2019-11-15 Thread Andy Seaborne (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1776. - Fix Version/s: Jena 3.14.0 Resolution: Fixed > RDFConnection with user/password fails

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-1776) RDFConnection with user/password fails intermittently on the second call.

2019-11-15 Thread Andy Seaborne (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-1776: --- Assignee: Andy Seaborne > RDFConnection with user/password fails intermittently on the

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1778) COUNT(DISTINCT *) can generate incorrect results.

2019-11-15 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16975068#comment-16975068 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1778: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1778) COUNT(DISTINCT *) can generate incorrect results.

2019-11-15 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16975069#comment-16975069 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1778: --- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1776) RDFConnection with user/password fails intermittently on the second call.

2019-11-15 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16975063#comment-16975063 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1776: --- Commit

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #630: JENA-1778: Hide system vars in COUNT(DISTINCT *)

2019-11-15 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #630: JENA-1778: Hide system vars in COUNT(DISTINCT *) URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/630 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #628: JENA-1776: Set Content-Length when sending a graph or dataset

2019-11-15 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #628: JENA-1776: Set Content-Length when sending a graph or dataset URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/628 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

Re: Jena next

2019-11-15 Thread Marco Neumann
when you say as an afterthought you refer to shiro? to define permissions functionality in a TTL configuration for high granularity would indeed be nice. why not do it somewhat similar to how it's done in mainstream RDBMS with SQL system tables? On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:07 AM Claude Warren

Re: Jena next

2019-11-15 Thread Claude Warren
I would like to see the permissions functionality baked into the standard implementations rather than wrapped around as an afterthought. However, if that can't be done or is just more overhead than we want when permissions are not in use then I would hope that we will continue to use interfaces

Re: Jena next

2019-11-15 Thread Marco Neumann
first of all Andy thank you for your leadership as PMC chair of the Apache Jena project, the PMCs and the Jena community. I do believe Jena as a technical project is in a good place to be considered as the development choice for any possible RDF related effort at this point. Over the last 20