+1 (non-binding with my supports and thanks)
Woonsan
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:55 AM Milamber wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The second release candidate for JMeter 5.4 (079404a06a) has been
> prepared, and your votes are solicited.
>
> This release brings some new features and improvements, and also
Hello,
I've submitted a PR: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/627
Please take a look.
Thanks in advance,
Woonsan
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 5:14 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:02 PM Philippe Mouawad
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:39
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:02 PM Philippe Mouawad
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
> > Hello Philippe,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 7:20 AM Philippe Mouawad
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Woonsan,
> >
Hi,
I have used HTTP Request sampler for GraphQL testing with setting
request body with escaped json strings like this:
{"operationName":null,"variables":{},"query":"{\n fineSomethings(text:
\"\", offset: 0, limit: 200) {\n offset\n limit\n count\n total\n
items {\n ... }\n }\n }\n }\n}\n"}
It
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 6:21 AM Vladimir Sitnikov
wrote:
>
> sebb> Is is absolutely necessary to move the files around?
>
> 1) What's wrong with moving files?
>
> 2) What's your suggestion?
> How are you going to co-locate runtime and test classes yet use
> current core/org/apache/jmeter folder
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:05 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:49 AM Philippe Mouawad
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 5:24 PM Graham Russell wrote:
> >
> > > Sebb:
> > > I will try again on a new VM and write them up, pe
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:49 AM Philippe Mouawad
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 5:24 PM Graham Russell wrote:
>
> > Sebb:
> > I will try again on a new VM and write them up, perhaps on Monday.
> >
> > I doubt it would have done it automatically, but it probably would
> > have been quicker
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:05 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 20 March 2017 at 22:57, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Monday, March 20, 2017,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 February 2017 at 22:39, wrote:
>> Author: pmouawad
>> Date: Tue Feb 28 22:39:25 2017
>> New Revision: 1784829
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784829=rev
>> Log:
>> Remove log_level
Hi folks,
Is there anyone working in unit tests for JDBC protocol?
If not, I'd like to take a look into it next week.
Cheers,
Woonsan
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Philippe Mouawad
wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for your proposal.
> Yes it is still up to date.
>
> You
mons-Logging
>
> Great initiative! Good to hear that project is migrating towards modern
> libraries.
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> On 11.02.2017 11:38, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm happy to announce that thanks to the huge work of Woonsan Ko, we've now
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Philippe Mouawad
> <philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2017, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 January
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Philippe Mouawad
<philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 4, 2017, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3 January 2017 at 20:59, Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>> &g
Hi,
I'd like to help with migrating from Apache LogKit to SLF4J [1], and
so I've been reading the current logging implementation with logkit,
avalon-framework and excalibur-logger.
>From my understanding, maybe we can take the following approach:
- Since SLF4J API doesn't provide a logging
14 matches
Mail list logo