Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Stephen Bannasch
At 4:30 PM -0700 5/2/08, Eric Armstrong wrote: >Thanks for the info, Stephen. > >(Interestingly, I chose to keep the longer name.) >:_) It would probably be best to use the shorter name which is what is used in Ruby 1.8.6_p114 and the trunk version of Ruby 1.8.7 development (they are the same):

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Cool. I attached the file to the bug. If I could /find/ the file in the svn download, it would be interesting to see how the patch process works... Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: Eric Armstrong wrote: Thanks for the kind words. They really do help. After an install, I would expect to find the f

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Thanks for the info, Stephen. (Interestingly, I chose to keep the longer name.) :_) Stephen Bannasch wrote: Eric, FYI: This is a known bug in Ruby 1.8.6. See: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=18567&group_id=426&atid=1698 http://www.germane-software.com/projects/rexml/

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Eric Armstrong wrote: Thanks for the kind words. They really do help. After an install, I would expect to find the file in the location you mention. But the whole idea is to create a patch, and editing the installed copy of the file won't do that, will it? But after checking out with SVN, I'm s

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Stephen Bannasch
Eric, FYI: This is a known bug in Ruby 1.8.6. See: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=18567&group_id=426&atid=1698 http://www.germane-software.com/projects/rexml/ticket/115 Here's the rexml patch I apply to the MRI Ruby 1.8.6_p111 source before I build it -- I'm sure it cou

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Thanks for the kind words. They really do help. After an install, I would expect to find the file in the location you mention. But the whole idea is to create a patch, and editing the installed copy of the file won't do that, will it? But after checking out with SVN, I'm seeing a bunch of Java-s

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Eric Armstrong wrote: Installed NB 6.1 fcs, figured out how to control parent dir for projects, and successfully downloaded the jruby project. Now, how do I find document.rb in the huge package list? (You guys have apparently been very, very busy.) :_) All the Ruby libs are under lib/ruby/1.8

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Installed NB 6.1 fcs, figured out how to control parent dir for projects, and successfully downloaded the jruby project. Now, how do I find document.rb in the huge package list? (You guys have apparently been very, very busy.) :_) Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: Eric Armstrong wrote: Also, the he

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
I just found the log file. I'm flumoxed. For some reason, NB began checking out the jruby files into another project I was working on--but not even the one I was working on in NB! So I now have ...\eric\ws\pubs6\jruby Where pubs6 is a documentation workspace! I rechecked the SVN dialog, and t

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Guys, I'm trying. But now I'm really hosed. I canceled what appeared to be a doomed download after 40 minutes, and tried again with a different username/password. I get the following SVN error: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) But of course, I'm in N

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Well, I filed the bug, for what that's worth. All the indentation was lost, and all indented comments turned into numbered lists. So the bug report is pretty useless. I'm trying to create a patch. Advice would be appreciated as to how to edit the bug report to insert or its equivalent... Charle

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
To start with, what username/password do I use? NetBeans is defaulting to the last one I used, on a completely different project. Do I use anonymous, or Headius ID, or JIRA ID? (NetBeans never gave me an error that reflected a problem in that area, so if that's the issue, there is an NB bug.) E

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-02 Thread Eric Armstrong
Ok. Thanks for the encouragement. (Found another doc bug, too) Problem with the directions, though: http://wiki.jruby.org/wiki/Making_a_Patch_on_NetBeans 2. Click "Versioning", select "Subversion", then "Checkout. ... NetBeans creates a JRuby project automatically (Checkout delivere

Re: [jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-01 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Eric Armstrong wrote: Also, the header comment is wrong. It says # indent:: # An integer. If -1, no indenting will be used; otherwise, the # indentation will be twice this number of spaces, ... It should say: # indent:: # An integer. If -1,

[jruby-dev] Re: Bug in REXML::Document

2008-05-01 Thread Eric Armstrong
Also, the header comment is wrong. It says # indent:: # An integer. If -1, no indenting will be used; otherwise, the # indentation will be twice this number of spaces, ... It should say: # indent:: # An integer. If -1, no indenting will be us