On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, kristian wrote:
> >> A quick list, scanning build_lib...
> >>
> >> Already being published to Maven for releases (but not snapshots):
> >>
> >> bytelist
> >> invokebinder
> >> jcodings
> >> jffi
> >>
I only have one inline comment below. We both largely have the same
organizing desires.
-Tom
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Ok folks...the branching off of 1.7 is coming very soon, and I think
> one of the biggest ticket items we need to do before then is reo
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, kristian wrote:
> >> A quick list, scanning build_lib...
> >>
> >> Already being published to Maven for releases (but not snapshots):
> >>
> >> bytelist
> >> invokebinder
> >> jcodings
> >> jffi
> >>
Yoko,
There are two goals I would like to see for 9k with these platforms in
mind. I would like looser coupling so that conditionally only part of our
codebase can be compiled. So if you are on a limited platform with no
socket support you should be able to omit it and our codebase will still
One thing I'd like to say in response to some of the negatives of Gradle is
that by using the gradle wrapper (
http://www.gradle.org/docs/current/userguide/gradle_wrapper.html) you get
the very nice benefit of being able to version your build tool along with
your code. You won't have to deal with i
well, I guess the important thing here is get it uniform among all the
artifacts managed my the jruby team. whether all be codehaus or all be
sonatype that is a matter of taste - I guess.
but be aware that maven central has mirrors and it can take even longer to
get artifacts on those mirrors - an
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> yydebug did come from jay but I agree we should probably just publish it.
> Probably for jay itself too even though it is not a Java library :)
Ok, so that should be added to the "yet to be mavenized" list.
Hopefully we would do it once an
It sounds we both have the same basic questions to answer. We can talk
about this more over this week and maybe take something completely new like
ripper and explore how we can re-org this into fitting our goals while not
boiling the Maven ocean.
-Tom
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Charles Ol
