On June 9, 2015, 7:58 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/OffsetResetStrategy.java,
line 16
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980077#file980077line16
Do we need NONE?
Jason Gustafson wrote:
It was there before, but I
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the KIP.
Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1646.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1646
Our company (Conversant Media) became a Kafka user pretty recently (about 3
months ago) and I have been following the user and dev group for the past
month, so could have missed the discussions on KIP-4.
In looking up the current command line capabilities in Kafka 0.8.2.1 (not the
latest
On June 9, 2015, 6:49 p.m., Jay Kreps wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 322
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line322
Do we need this? There is no real guarantee on the poll time, so it
seems
On June 9, 2015, 7:58 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 1212
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line1212
-1 makes the pollClient block forever. So, we don't get a chance to do
the
On June 9, 2015, 6:49 p.m., Jay Kreps wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 322
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line322
Do we need this? There is no real guarantee on the poll time, so it
seems
+1
On Jun 10, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Jay Kreps j...@confluent.io wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen honghai.c...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the
KIP. Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after
On June 9, 2015, 7:58 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 1212
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line1212
-1 makes the pollClient block forever. So, we don't get a chance to do
the
On June 9, 2015, 7:58 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 1212
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line1212
-1 makes the pollClient block forever. So, we don't get a chance to do
the
+1
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen honghai.c...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the
KIP. Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1646.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1646
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Kafka-trunk/506/changes
Changes:
[wangguoz] KAFKA-2253; fix deadlock between removeWatchersLock and watcher
operations list lock; reviewed by Onur Karaman and Jiangjie Qin
--
[...truncated 419 lines...]
Jayesh,
Most of the metadata you mentioned already exist. For example, ISR is
already in the TopicMetadataResponse and the high water mark can be
returned from the OffsetRequest. The details of the current wire protocol
can be found at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14580837#comment-14580837
]
Mayuresh Gharat commented on KAFKA-2253:
Thanks [~guozhang] for this patch. I
+1
On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:36 AM, JG Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen
honghai.c...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long
On June 9, 2015, 7:58 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/KafkaConsumer.java,
line 1212
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34789/diff/8/?file=980075#file980075line1212
-1 makes the pollClient block forever. So, we don't get a chance to do
the
+1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:36 AM, JG Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guozhang Wang updated KAFKA-2253:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Deadlock in delayed operation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14580921#comment-14580921
]
Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-2253:
--
Thanks for all the reviews! Committed to
+1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen
honghai.c...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the KIP.
Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen
honghai.c...@microsoft.com wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the KIP.
Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1646.
Glenn Sontheimer created KAFKA-2261:
---
Summary: Provide a configurable timeout for NetworkClient.send
Key: KAFKA-2261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2261
Project: Kafka
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33204/#review87450
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the patch. +1. Just some minor comments below.
+1
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Honghai Chen honghai.c...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a long discussion, please help vote again for the
KIP. Thanks.
I wrote a KIP for this after some discussion on KAFKA-1646.
Jun Rao created KAFKA-2262:
--
Summary: LogSegmentSize validation should be consistent
Key: KAFKA-2262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2262
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jiangjie Qin resolved KAFKA-2261.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
This is duplicate to KAFKA-2120 and KIP-19 addressed it.
Provide a
Hi Kafka,
After a few rounds of discussion on KIP-25, there doesn't seem to be
opposition, so I'd like to propose a vote.
Thanks,
Geoff
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey Anderson ge...@confluent.io
wrote:
Hi KIP-25 thread,
I consolidated some of the questions from this thread and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/35201/#review87495
---
core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/DelayedOperation.scala
+1 (non-binding. Actually, since this is non-binding anyway, lets make
it +100. I'm so so excited about having a usable testing framework)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Geoffrey Anderson ge...@confluent.io wrote:
Hi Kafka,
After a few rounds of discussion on KIP-25, there doesn't seem to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14581292#comment-14581292
]
Ashish K Singh commented on KAFKA-1367:
---
[~junrao] and [~jjkoshy], correct me if my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14581473#comment-14581473
]
Jinder Aujla commented on KAFKA-2022:
-
Hi
I also noticed this, here is part of the
+1
~ Joestein
On Jun 10, 2015 10:21 PM, Neha Narkhede n...@confluent.io wrote:
+1. Thanks Geoff!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:20 PM -0700, Gwen Shapira
gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding. Actually, since this is non-binding anyway, lets make
it +100. I'm so so excited
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gwen Shapira updated KAFKA-1882:
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.8.3)
Create extendable channel interface and default implementations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gwen Shapira resolved KAFKA-1882.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
I believe this is already handled in the SSL patches
Create extendable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14581419#comment-14581419
]
manpreet singh commented on KAFKA-1792:
---
Integrated the patch and tested this new
+1. Thanks Geoff!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:20 PM -0700, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
+1 (non-binding. Actually, since this is non-binding anyway, lets make
it +100. I'm so so excited about having a usable testing framework)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Geoffrey
35 matches
Mail list logo
